Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
21 June 2023 at 15:50 in reply to: Is the TC9177P IC4 a common failure on the Beomaster 6500 pre-amp? #46733
That is good to hear.
Just curious, what was the cause for the “irregular volume levels on the right” channel that you mentioned in the original post?
Glitch
21 June 2023 at 13:08 in reply to: Is the TC9177P IC4 a common failure on the Beomaster 6500 pre-amp? #46731Glitch, I do have an oscilloscope, will try to probe the signals, not sure what to look for though. Tested all of the grounds, all good. At this point, it might be best if i find a proper remote
Checking the DATA should be pretty straightforward (if you want to poke around while waiting for your remote to arrive). The diagrams below are from the cTC9177P datasheet.
Connect the scope to DATA, CK, and STROBE signals and “single trigger” the scope off the STROBE.
Once you have a data packet captured it can be decoded with the info above. There is also a more detailed description in the datasheet. It looks like two DATA packets will need to be captured, one for the L command and one for the R command, to debug possible balance issues.
Glitch
20 June 2023 at 13:54 in reply to: Is the TC9177P IC4 a common failure on the Beomaster 6500 pre-amp? #46726Do you have a logic analyzer (or oscilloscope) to check the DATA/CK/STROBE signals? Manually decoding the DATA packet will answer your “balance” question.
Are the chip grounds solid?
Glitch
Advice?
I agree with Martin’s comments. It sounds like you have the stereo equivalent of an automobile that has been “totaled”. Sure, you could fix it, but it will take an inordinate amount of time and money, and it may not ever be right again. I understand the desire to fix it, especially if the “journey is more important than the destination”.
Another possibility is to buy another BM5000 that is in very poor cosmetic condition and swap the best parts to make one good machine.
Glitch
BTW, one thing that has not been mentioned is that the lifespan of modern foam is likely much longer than the original foam. Progress in material science has advanced in the decades since the original surrounds were produced. Of course, one could still end of with bad surrounds, either foam or rubber, if purchased from a poor source.
Glitch
Yep, it looks like the BG8000 board is different than the BG8002 board. It was worth a try…
Debugging is certainly complicated by the muting relay shorting everything to ground. I don’t know the details of what you are trying to accomplish, but sometimes simply removing the relay for debugging can make things easier to understand.
Glitch
Here is a picture of the connections on a BG8002.
Hope this helps (and you don’t have to deal with the same glue on the solder).
Glitch
I found this review while doing a quick search, https://hackaday.com/2018/05/17/review-fg-100-dds-function-generator/
What you propose above will most likely work, especially if all you are hoping for is “better than nothing” on a measurement that isn’t critically sensitive.
Personally, I wouldn’t trust that (or any similar) device unless I hooked it up to a scope and tested it for the intended usage. Please don’t misunderstand me, I actually like those cheap devices. I have a bunch of similar devices in my “parts box” ;-). I’ve also found a few “gems” that are very useful. Just keep in mind there is a usually a very good reason that they are dirt cheap.
Buying decent quality tools makes any hobby more enjoyable. Junk tools can be very frustrating, especially when one is learning.
Do you trust that your multimeter is accurate enough to calibrate your signal generator?
Glitch
Inexpensive (or cheap) is a very relative term. How much are you looking to spend?
Check out the Digilent Analog Discovery 2. It is an all-in-one package that has a scope, signal generator, logic analyzer, and variable power supply for $400. All of the functionality is limited compared to much more expensive, dedicated bench equipment, but it does a good job at what it does.
Glitch
Admittedly, I’m not in the target demographic for this product. However, I wonder how many potential customers are out there that would spend that kind of money for “orange and birch”. Is this combination a “latest trend”?
I fully understand the aesthetic appeal of the 72-22. Interesting wood veneers are timeless, as are natural metal finishes.
I could see B&O building this as a bespoke product, but wonder how profitable it will be even as a low volume special edition. Does B&O publish sales numbers on products like this (i.e. 72-22, 4000c, etc.)?
Glitch
I agree with much of what you wrote. Especially the part about B&O leaning on reference designs for the core functionality. My comments were referring to “value” of the modifications more than “performance potential”.
For example, lets say one starts with a 200€ S45 and installed 150€ of fancy capacitors in it. It is still only a 200€ speaker to most people. It might be worth a bit more to someone that isn’t able (or willing) to do the modifications themselves. It might be worth a lot less to an enthusiast that doesn’t trust the quality somebody else’s work or wants originality. It is most likely worth more than 350€ to the person that made the modifications because it is exactly what they want.
Many people would rather spend the same 350€ on something higher up the product line, say a S75, than take the risk on installing expensive parts without a guarantee that they will like the results. There is less risk with buying the S75 since it could be sold for what one paid for it if they don’t like the performance.
Installing relatively inexpensive electrolytic caps makes more sense to me. A kit can be purchased for less than 18€. One could assemble their own “kit” for less if they valued their money more than their time. The expensive caps could always be tried if one liked the direction of progress (or the speaker sold for 200€ at a small loss).
Glitch
I did find a technician who was able to fix the problem causing my speaker amp to overheat.
That’s good news. IMHO, Pentas are worth the effort to keep running.
I expect that someone will provide good suggestions on what to try to repair the CD player. “Recycling” the player should be a very last resort. Any B&O gear has value, especially if it is in nice cosmetic condition.
Glitch
Actually, refoaming surrounds is not that difficult. The smaller the speakers the more easy it is.
I used to think the same thing until I started measuring the performance of the drivers that I restored. It is pretty easy to make the drivers “look” better or sound better than with totally rotten foam. Matching the T/S parameters of a original/new driver or building a perfectly matched set is a different matter. I guess it all depends on what one’s goals and expectations are…
Glitch
I agree that a vintage speaker’s value is best preserved by keeping it stock. However, I don’t quite understand the logic in some of the statements above.
Why is it any different to install boutique foil capacitors than to swap the tweeter (per the OP’s question)? Either modification will (arguably) change the voicing of the speaker from the original.
Glitch
Previously I haven’t give it much thought but upon measuring I found that the BeoMaster 7000 measures 40° celcius at the heat fins on the back of the amplifier. Granted it is warmer today at measurement.
Just to be clear, you are talking about the temperature when the Beomaster is in full standby, or essentially as “off” as it can be?
Do you have the ability to measure the current draw from the outlet? That would be more definitive for any comparisons than trying to measure temperature.
Glitch
The problem _could_ be a poor connection between the turntable and the amplifier, but why would it _always_ push sound through the LH channel at needle drop & needle rise only?
It is a long shot, but if there is a crack or loose connection then the tracking force (or tone arm angle change) might be enough to open it up.
Another possible test is to measure the resistance between the pins of each channel at the connector on the rear of the turntable. Each should start close to 0.0 ohms and jump to 740 ohms when the stylus drops and the muting relay opens. The reading should switch back to zero when you raise the stylus.
Glitch
The encoder is a Calt PD30-8G1000BST5. I believe that you can buy it on Amazon (mine was purchased elsewhere). The brass adapter to mount the encoder wheel on the motor or capstan shaft and the magnetic mounts for the encoder pickup where both custom fabricated.
Glitch
I’m so glad you discovered a way around using a Dremel. That will same a bunch of time and effort.
It also avoids creating metal dust around the motor magnet. This kind of contamination is very difficult to remove.
Can you go into detail of what you did for your performance measurements?
I tried many different things. I did the obvious stuff like measuring motor current. I also added an encoder to measure motor speed. The brass encoder adapter is also machined to attach to the capstan shaft. For the motor vibration, the simplest setup was a mechanics stethoscope coupled to a microphone.
The data from the various sensors is logged and post-processed offline. I tried to run a variety of experiments, like comparing the “drop of oil” method against the “vacuum oiling” method. Unfortunately, my number of samples is statistically insignificant so it is hard to make truly conclusive statements without caveats.
I can go into a lot more detail, but it would be helpful if you had specific questions. It is hard to provide the appropriate level of detail without understanding someone’s interests and technical background.
Glitch
I ended up buying a couple of dead Beocord 8000’s. I want to experiment on something appropriate before tearing into my beloved Beocord 9000. I learned quite a bit in the process. I won’t go into the whole story since there are a lot of details. However, I thought that people might be interested in a few highlights…
1) I found it is not necessary to do any Dremeling to get the motor lid off. I used a pair of snap ring expansion pliers to pop off the lid. The lid can be pressed back on without leaving any indication that work was done.
2) My motors were the same as in sonavor’s pictures. The motors themselves were surprisingly easy to take apart. The only things to be careful with are to not break the plastic clips holding the motor together and to pay attention to the white plastic spacer on the armature shaft. The motor tachometer is nothing like a Beogram 400x motor. The wire arrangement is such that one would have to try hard to break the thin wires.
3) The motor bearings are not like the Beogram bearings. They are different sizes. The bearing retention is similar. Making a tool for crimping the bearing retainer is easier than what is shown on the Beolover site. A simple piece of wooden dowel will work.
4) The windings in one of the motors were burnt up. Rewinding the armature is possible.
5) Bearing cleaning in preparation for vacuum oiling isn’t critical. I tried to thoroughly clean one set of bearings and skipped the prep work on another. Either way, the before/after of the oil bath was the same. I attribute the change of color to the old amber colored oil coming out of the bearings.
6) I ran a some experiments to refine the process for vacuum oiling. This is beyond what I would want to describe in this post. One thing that I will mention is that I’m skeptical about being able to a good job at vacuum oiling without a proper vacuum pump.
7) I measured the performance of the motors using several methods. The plots above are FFT’s of the motor vibration. The motor in the first plot was obviously noisy. The motor in the second plot was the one with the burnt armature, but was quiet. The third plot was from my BC9000 which started in very good condition. The light blue is before, the dark blue is after vacuum oiling. All three motors are now performing more similarly. I have a more data, but I assume that I’m the only one that geeks out on data analysis.
8) I also vacuum oiled other sintered bearings from the tape transport. I weighed all the bearings before and after to get a feel for how much oil that I added to the bearings. There were things that I found very interesting in the data analysis, but the bottom line is that a well done vacuum oiling is worth the effort. …but you already knew that!
I was able to repair both of the broken Beocord 8000’s and get them 100% working. I did the normal stuff like replace a few bad caps, new belts, rubber tires, LED display rebuild, reflowed solder joints, etc. Now the hard part… figuring out what to do with extra tape players ;-).
Glitch
That sounds like a good plan. Dillen is correct when he says that the odor may never fully go away.
I see the telltale rings that look like the speakers were used as a plant stand. Moisture from watering the plants may be the original cause of the mold. It appears that there was enough moisture for the cabinet seams to separate. There is some good info on audiokarma about how to handle this particular repair if you don’t get suitable suggestions here. Search for GD70 (Glenn) as he usually posts good descriptions/pictures of the repairs.
After you have the speakers repaired put them on tilted speaker stands. I don’t know if the tilt actually does anything for the sound, but it does keep your partner from putting plants on the speakers :-).
Glitch
-
AuthorPosts