Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Not totally correct. The rl140 used foam surrounds, and the rl7000 rubber surrounds.
If you compare the crossover they are the same.
But the rl60 has a passive membrane and the rl60 w has a bassreflex.
Im gonna refoam my rl140’s with rubber you and not with foam. If the flexibility for both surrounds is the same, just take the most durable ones…lesser sensitive to temperature and moist fluctuations. Ok
Kan zijn dat de clamper op de spindel van de laser of de magnetische clamper beschadigd is/gebarsten… en zo je cds beschadigt. Best momenteel niet meer gebruiken tot het opgelost is
Veel succes. Laat eens weten wat eraan gedaan is, ben benieuwd 🙂
aus technischer sicht sind mk1 und 2 gleichwertig. mk2 ABL (alias mk3) ist jedoch anders. (ab sn 20xxx) der lautsprecher klingt einfach viel voller und tiefer in den niedrigen frequenzen.
für die neueste Version verlangen sie rund 1500 €, für das mk2 900 €. aber ein gewartetes Paar mk1 ist billiger und klingt genauso wie das teurere mk2
Ik kan er anders ook voor je naar kijken. Ik woon ook in Belgie, Brugge. Je kiest wat het gemakkelijkst lijkt.
At speakerrepairshop they are extremely friendly. Don’t forget the special glue. But you can choose at their shop if you want foam or rubber surrounds. Ask their opinion
Could be that the laser reach the end. Or laser current must be corrected ( don’t do if you are not familiar, you would kill the laser from overcurrent)
Im not totally agreed. You had beovox rl60 who had foam surrounds, after that rl60.2 with rubber surrounds. For durability i would take rubber surrounds. But that is my opinion. I would not re-do the process each 15y because it’s time consuming
Zo vlug mogelijk laten doen. Hoelanger de foam erin blijft zitten hoe meer schade er kan aangericht worden…
Probleem is, 9000 heeft speakerlink en 9300 heeft powerlink.
9000 met de bl6000 is geen goed huwelijk vrees ik. Stel anders je vraag eens aan Steave van Sounds heavenly. Die gast wel ern oplossing vinden.waarom gebruik je niet de bc9000 met passieve speakers en bc9300 met lab6000?
Hello, do you still own the Beolink 7000 ?
Noo it is an extremely expensive grease. I ordered in the past the lubrication from B&O.
Klüber Barrierta grease L55/1
try to buy a small amount because 1kg cost 1755€.
it is a white grease, not corrosive to plastic gears and bearings.You mean the laser or a new cdpro2 module?
Regarding the differences:
beocenter 9000 has another laser than the 9500 ( identical to cd5500) and the 9300 has original cdm4, upgraded to cdpro ( same laser like Beosound 1 cd).
Well actually the bc2000 has output to passive speakers ( beovox) and your beolab needs powerlink, a variable line signal…
You need to be creative and make a PL cable L to output cinch L and one PL cable R to output cinch R.
it is a variable signal so you can use active speakers or a stereo power amp or monoblock’s.
or if you want to do it neat like B&O, one powerlink cable and at the other end L and R out
NOO don’t replace the woofers. Just replace the foam surrounds with rubber ones so they will not desintegrate again in 15y. If you replace the woofers, it is not the same speaker again. Rubber surrounds are cheaply to obtain. If you can’t do it, ask somebody to do that.
and just look how the capacitors are in the crossover ( mostly Roederstein elco’s i think, now Vichay).
succesIt is not that easy. It is not only the woofers but partially the amplifiers too.
20xxx and i know they are mk2 with abl (aka mk3).
Actually i know exactly that there are 4 versions of the 8000…
And i hear the difference between mk2 and mk2 ABL too…
29 November 2022 at 10:33 in reply to: Beolab 4000 vs Beovox CX 100 – which one is the better solution? #35167If you compare the specs, the cx100 is going derper in the low frequency range but the maximum sound pressure is higher in the bl4000
-
AuthorPosts