Sound quality/ reliability comparisons of different beomaster receivers

Home Forums General Discussion & Questions Sound quality/ reliability comparisons of different beomaster receivers

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3131
    bjornklh
    BRONZE Member
      • Topics Started 2
      • Total Posts 2

      I am wondering if people here had feedback on the different beomaster / beosystem receivers over the years, and which ones sound the best. I have done a lot of research on this with the sources I can find. Would be curious how they sound compared to other vintage audio, from brands like sansui, marantz, newer nad, etc.

      The ones I have read some good things, but am also wondering if people had experience with.

      901/90.    1000. (early 70s)     3000.    2200 (the older version)

      ones i know are good, from other things I have read:

      6000.        2400.      5000/5500.     4400

      Also would be curious which of the beomasters are the least trouble prone.

       

      Thanks in advance for any thoughts/ comparisons of any of the listed models.

      Also, new to the forum, so hi. Also looking for people in the US that refurb vintage B+O.C4

      C3

      C1

      C2

       

       

       

       

    Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.