Home › Forums › Product Discussion & Questions › BeoMaster › Beomaster 6500 does not respond to remote control
- This topic has 12 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 17 hours, 5 minutes ago by
Dillen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
18 September 2025 at 19:26 #69748
Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberHi! I’ve been investigating a Beomaster 6500 for a while which does not respond to remote control inputs. I’ve tried both a 5500 MCP and a Beolink 1000. The unit does power up if I press any of the buttons on the Beomaster 6500, but it still does not respond to remote control signals.
Funny enough it occasionally did respond to remote control every 5-10 power-up. But since I’ve changed the 4700uF capacitor (for 5V if I remember correctly) which measured ~6300uF, it never responds. On the occasion when it actually came to live from the remote it also could produce decent sound. So the Beomaster 6500 is pretty ok, but just won’t listen or speak. I’ve double checked that the 4700uF is mounted properly and all voltage levels seems decent.
I’ve changed the capacitors on the transmitter (and the few ones on the CPU board) and the IR diods flashes via the mobile camera. So I’m pretty sure the transmitter works. The receiver also seems to work. At least I see signals coming in on the R70 close to the CPU. But I wonder if there’s something fishy with it?
Sometimes I get a base square wave of ~100Hz and other times ~50Hz. If I press a button on the MCP I can see some sort of signal coming in and the frequency increases for a short period. The Vpp is around 5V so that also seems fine.
At the moment I’m a bit clueless of how to continue so any feedback is welcome!
/Martin
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.18 September 2025 at 19:53 #69751 GuyModeratorHi and welcome to Beoworld!
Are you sure that the BM6500 is not in A.OPT 0, where it will not response to IR control?
To change back, with the system at stand-by, use the BL1000 and press SOUND then 1 then STORE. Now try the remote again.
Location: Warwickshire, UK
My B&O Icons:
19 September 2025 at 15:51 #69767Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberThank you for your reply! No, unfortunately it didn’t help. I can see the IR receiver signal in the oscilloscope, but the Beomaster is still cranky.
I have a Beomaster 5500 which responds to both the MCP and the BL1000 so I know the remotes are working. Well, I had to replace to opto sensor in the MCP to be able to control the volume…
19 September 2025 at 16:55 #69768Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberI kept power down and up with 30-60s in power down, and eventually it responded to the remotes! The idle square wave actually looks a bit different now. It’s ~50 Hz and the duty cycle looks rather different from the two previous photos and is more steady. So I guess I have to investigate what is driving the idle square wave. I have had a glance at the circuit of course, but there are mainly BCnnn transistors which rarely fails from my experience. But it would be a rather quick thing to change them, if I have them at home. Well, there’s a BF240 and I don’t have any BFnnn transistors. Will check if I can replace it.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.6 October 2025 at 18:35 #70177Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberI put the BM6500 on hold for a while, but yesterday I started to troubleshoot it again. It’s not a lot of transistors in the IR receiver and I tried to replace a few. But with no positive result. When testing the BF240 I got an extra diode in the test screen which I haven’t seen before (see the attached file). I think the transistor is fine, as the other BF240 showed an identical image. I put them back as they seemed fine. Anyone who knows what the extra diode means?
I’m not even sure where the 100Hz is I see on the final IR input signal coming from. The only LC-circuit I see is the IR receiver and that sure (I think at least) doesn’t produce 100Hz.
Anyhow, I have a working BM5500. By looking at the schematics I could try to replace the front PCB with the one from BM5500. Actually the schematics for the 5500 and the 6500 are confusingly identical. I got even unsure if I actually had the right schematics, but it seems so. If I can replace the PCB, I can also check the signal from start to end and compare. That should give me a clue of what is wrong, or if it’s actually something else.
Does anyone know for certain if the IR receiver/transceiver boards are identical for the BM5500 and the BM6500? I wouldn’t like to end up with two broken Beomasters…
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.6 October 2025 at 23:18 #70184TK
GOLD MemberJust an alternate approach – if you purchased a used MCL2 2047 or an MCL2A and accompanying transceiver, you could hook it up to the 6500 and control it via the MCL2 link. It might set you back $150 on eBay for all the pieces. It’s not without a bit of additional trickery surrounding muting. I’m working on software for my on edification which simplifies this process, but its primarily lab-grown tinkering software at this point, and is months away from being usable by others.
7 October 2025 at 07:08 #70187Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberThank you for your suggestion! But I have already a project plan for a long winter (or two) which is to replace the Mostek 3870 CPU in a BM6000 with an atmega-1284p 😊
8 October 2025 at 18:29 #70232Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberSince nobody objected, I put board 9 from the BM6500 in the BM5500, and this combo works fine 🙂 So that’s a relief at least. Also the CPU boards (4) looks exactly identical so I will try switching in the one from BM6500 next. The SW may be a bit different, but switching between inputs should be the same.
10 October 2025 at 07:36 #70272Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberSo tested to put the BM6500 CPU board (4) into the BM5500. I found that there is one difference on the CPU boards and that’s P17, which is unmounted on BM6500. It seems to be a loopback from the IR tranceiver to the receiver to avoid receiving what is sent out. But there’s already a transistor to do that job, so I guess they found P17 to be unnecessary. Anyways the BM6500 CPU board didn’t wake up on IR receiver input in the BM5500. Now I at least knows it is not the photodiode or the LC-circuit of the IR-receiver which is broken.
The BM5500 is now reassembled and working again. Perhaps I’ll open it up again to take photos of the oscilloscope at different stages of the IR receiver circuit, to compare with the BM6500. Or I’ll just replace the rest of the transistors on the IR receiver circuit. The only replacement for the BF240 would be my BF494, but I’m not sure it’s a good replacement so I’d leave it for last. For the 455 kHz filter I have not clue. I’ll google… Perhaps I should also check the 50/60 Hz signal coming on the board. Actually I should have put the BM5500 CPU board into the BM6500 also, just to rule out that there’s anything fishy with the BM6500 power supply board.
14 October 2025 at 08:27 #70420Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberI tried putting the CPU board from BM5500 in the BM6500 (with the BM6500 front PCB), and that works fine. I also tried to replace all the transistors in the IR receiver path, but no “luck”. So either it’s the 455 kHz (ceramic?) filter or any of the small capacitors, or something completely different. Really puzzling.
I was a bit surprised that the first transistors after the 455 kHz filter has such high voltage rating (65V). Does voltage build up due to the filter? There seems to be no apparent risk of external electric shock. It does not seems so easy to find a replacement for the 455 kHz filter. At least not in Sweden, but I’ve found a SMD which I can try to add leaders on.
14 October 2025 at 19:01 #70459Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberA small progress was made today. On the BM5500 CPU board there is no 50 or 100 Hz in the IR reciever signal, as far as I can see. So I checked 5Va and that is stable, but on the other side of R45 which feeds the IR receiver, I can clearly see voltage fluctuate at 100 Hz (double 50Hz). Not a lot but it gets amplified of course. I replaced a few capacitors, although it feels stupid to replace ceramic capacitors in a low voltage circuit. I’ll replace the rest and all the diodes in the IR receiver circuit another day. If that is not doing anything I have to try to check the ground plane I guess (I’m not sure how I can do that). The fact that the BM5500 CPU board works in the BM6500 should mean that there is no problem with the power supply, but the 50/100Hz disturbance signal sure is pointing at the power supply as the culprit.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.16 October 2025 at 08:38 #70499Martin Lundholm
BRONZE MemberYesterday I focused on the 455 kHz band-pass filter. If I disconnect the IR reciever, there is no 50 Hz disturbance. So it *could* be the band-pass filter, which is broken. Not very likely, but I’m running out of likely causes. The only 455 kHz band-pass filter available in my local shop is CFUCF455KB4X, which is surface mounted. So I bought a small adapter board for a SO8 to DIL8 and soldered the SMD filter on that. And then I replaced the original filter with this one. But still no “luck” with getting the Beomaster to respond on remote control signals. I will continue another day to make certain the new band-pass filter is connected correctly. But it may very well be that the new filter is not suitable for the Beomaster. I think I’m getting closer to give up (putting it on a shelf for another year) on the BM6500.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.2 November 2025 at 07:02 #70848Dillen
ModeratorA bad main CPU can also cause the remote to not work. I have replaced several with bad IR inputs.
Martin
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.










