Home Forums Product Discussion & Questions BeoSound Beosound 9000 MK2 – more “risk” compared to MK3

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #44998
    BeoMarc
    BRONZE Member

      Hallo dear friends,

      Some time ago I had the opportunity to buy a MK3 but sadly the seller cancelled the deal at the last moment 🙁

      So now I am still looking to buy a BS9000

      But I was wondering if a MK2 is more risky to buy compared with a MK3

      Can both as “easyly” be repaired or is there a difference ?

      For example is it the same laser etc….

      Thank you.

       

       

       

      #44999
      BeoMarc
      BRONZE Member

        No one ?

        #45000
        matador
        Moderator
          • Paris France

          As far as I know…

          It is not more risky to buy an MK2 than a MK3. Last year I would in fact have told you that it was the other way around: given the most common fault is a laser failure, MK3 has a specific laser assembly hard to find or at crazy price at B&O when MK2 has a more usual one you can find anywhere for a couple of bucks. Since then I’ve learned that most laser failures can be solved with a deep lens cleaning (lens up/down and mirror).

          In regard to other fault, I don’t remember one unit was more prone to failure than the other one and for all of them even if problems happens sometimes, its a relatively robust unit and in most cases, easily serviceable. Then the only factual parameter would be that MK3 are of course more “young” units and it may have an impact on the mechanical parts (carriage noise, door mechanism strength, discs clamps softness, etc…)

          Hope this helps.

          #45001
          BeoMarc
          BRONZE Member

            Merci beaucoup!!!

            Thank you very much. Very good and plausible answer.

          Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.