Jeff wrote:
One thing I've always been curious about is the difference between MOTS and Apple's Genius. No one I know has ever done the experiment of taking a BS5 and iTunes libraries with the same songs, seeding them with the same start song, and seeing how they differ in the playlist they come up with. Neither B&O nor Apple are forthcoming with details of the algorithms they use to select songs, they are pretty closely held. I have no person experience with MOTS, but on Genius it can come up with some odd matches. I was saying to my wife once how did it get from this to that, and she listened for a minute, and said same tempo, or beats per minute (she being the musician would key on that). I guess it knows BPM, year song came out, artist, genre, album, and probably more. How it combines that into a playlist...who knows?
MOTS was developped in Austria in the late nineties and to my understanding its algorithm was licenced to B&O.
MOTS compares audio files and recognizes similarities in rhythm. Based on press descriptions of the algorithm it calculates features which are critical to our listening and which characterize a song by its audiosignal (rhythm, frequency, sound patterns etc). From these features, MOTS calculates and files statistical models which represent specific songs / music titles in a compressed form.
Depending on the music title to begin with, the seeding can be quite similar. With my BS5, I sometimes reseed with a different song - a simple operation with the GO button...
In essence, I consider MOTS as being rather sophisticated and nicely complementing play lists which are also possible in BS5.
My question would be if the algorithm gets developed and refined further as it was launched 5 years ago...