Gentlemen
I'm glad this subject has been opened.
Firstly, if there is empirical proof that the Blue Philips cap is better, I will be the first in line to start using them again.
However, until now, all I have seen is "He said", and "They said".
That doesn't constitute engineering proof.
For the history of WHY Philips used these capacitors, we need to look at the BIGGER picture of the corporate alignment of the European companies in the 1970's and 1980's, which was an extremely turbulent time in the Electronics industry, with the Japanese making destructive inroads into the markets controlled by Philips, Grundig and others.
I worked for Grundig right at that time, so I remember it extremely well, shutting down the productions lines in Germany, and moving them to Portugal.
Does anyone ever remember seeing Radial Philips capacitors in any electronic equipment of that era?
Nope.
Why not Philips Radial caps in B&O (B&O was partly owned by Philips for some time)?
Philips made ONLY Axial capacitors, and they made absolutely CERTAIN to use their OWN in-house Components (where possible) on their PCB's. That's why (failing any technically-proficient position) we see that Blue capacitor in Position C2103.
Has anyone ever taken a good look inside other high-quality European equipment (besides B&O), such as Studer?
What's inside are Roederstein Radial caps. You won't find a single Philips capacitor inside. Competition issues, during a VERY tough time.
BTW, B&O used Philips Axial caps, and Roederstein Radial caps.
So Philips had to make a purely commercial decision who to use for Radial caps (during a time when money was in VERY tight supply).
I'm sure they looked at Roederstein, but they made the (excellent, in hindsight) decision to go with Nichicon.
If any of you have worked on any Studer equipment (as I have), you already know with absolute certainty that every one of the hundreds of installed Roderstein caps is beyond shot.
And if we look at Philips' CDM PCB's - the same ones used in B&O's players - we see that ALL the Nichicon caps are just fine, while the Blue Philips caps are completely shot.
Now, before throwing out more "But He said"s, permit me to ask ONE simple question.
Is there anyone out here, who has done EXACTLY the following test procedure to PROVE, once and for all, that the Blue Philips cap is superior for position C2103?
1. Installed a new Blue Philips cap of 33uF or 47uF onto the Philips-manufactured Servo PCB, and had the laser return to normal operation.
THEN
2. Removed the Blue Philips cap, and installed a high-quality 33uF or 47uF Nichicon (Philips' primary outside choice) in the same position, and then witnessed a complete failure to work?
If there IS somebody who has that empirical proof, please stand forward.
If there is nobody who has that proof, I cannot accept conjecture or "He said", as a pertinent argument.
Engineering is based on pure facts, not conjecture or opinions.
At the end of this troubleshooting, I will do EXACTLY that test, and let you all know how it goes.
And if I am proved wrong for having used a Nichicon cap INSTEAD of a Philips cap, I will be the first to admit it.
Until then, kindly let's stick to facts.
Menahem