Hi everybody,
a question that may be a little provocative. However, we've heard it all time and time again that B&O is style over substance, overpriced and you simply pay for the design and not so much for the sound. For me, another aspect is - do speakers really sound that different in a sense of better or worse? Or is the experience of listening to music not more driven by the quality of the recording or the quality of the music itself? Doesn't the human ear adapt to the sound of a particular speaker anyways so that after some timedifferences or not as important as when comparing side by side - just when painting walls in a different colour and everything is different and new and great at first but after some weeks psychologically it feels just like before? So what is the "audiophile" that so many talk about when criticizing B&O for being not? And in turn - what is qudiophile and in what ways is it better than B&O? Or stated differently - are the differences in sound reproduction really that significant or important to make design aspects pale in comparison? Of course you can't generalize but I hope you get what I'm after.
Cheers,
Kai