Sound system in V1-40 same as BeoLit 12?

49 replies

Just realized that BeoLit 12 has 120w total amplifiers and 2x2 inch tweeters and 4 inch woofer just like the V1-40. I think it might be the very same setup. What do you think?

It says on v1 tech specs that it has support for dolby 5.1 and dts 2.0. Does that mean that DTs only works for a stereo setup? I like DTS and always choose it before dolby digital. And no HD sound codec support either.

Perhaps Geoff have a good answer for this. I would even pay extra for licence to play these codecs that my old yamaha rx-v3800 play without a problem since I bought it five years ago.

I do like it anyway but I want it to work as good as it can. It has better sound than much else so the software should not be limiting the software, right?

It can take PCM audio so I guess if the bluray player or whatever can convert HD to PCM that it is ok anyway?

PS. I will probably get my V1-40 next week according to my retailer :) happy anyhow and I think the sound modes are genial. And I think the technical spec sheet on beoplay.com is wrong, it certainly looks weird at least with large fonts mixed with normal.

I don't think that the speakers are the same, just look at the price of BL12, also, the BL12 speaker units require extremely little cabinet volume BUT a wall right behind.

It would be nice to have a review of the sound of the V1-40 and V1-32 vs the Beolit 12 ...

Could early owners rate the sound?

And regarding the surround module. I think that B&O recommend that you let your player make the decoding and then send it to the TV as PCM, therefore there is no need to support DTS, DD TrueHD, DTS MA etc.

Reason for supporting DD surround (from my point of view) is that you need this for TV signals using HD, where the sound normally (always?) is using Dolby Digital.

By doing so, B&O also saves money as they don't need to buy license to all the different formats.

beolion wrote:

I don't think that the speakers are the same, just look at the price of BL12, also, the BL12 speaker units require extremely little cabinet volume BUT a wall right behind.

I think they have about the same amount of cabinet volume actually and I think it is easier for B&O to use one solution in several places instead of many different parts. But I am not sure. The BeoLit 12 has a price set after function, design and quality, I don't think the price is just for the speakers.

I agree that a comparison between the systems would be interesting also =)

beolion wrote:

And regarding the surround module. I think that B&O recommend that you let your player make the decoding and then send it to the TV as PCM, therefore there is no need to support DTS, DD TrueHD, DTS MA etc.

Reason for supporting DD surround (from my point of view) is that you need this for TV signals using HD, where the sound normally (always?) is using Dolby Digital.

By doing so, B&O also saves money as they don't need to buy license to all the different formats.

I am not sure I like that philosophy because I am not sure that all players can decode the signal. And if they do, is it good enough?

Michael wrote:
I am not sure that all players can decode the signal. And if they do, is it good enough?

I can't speak definitively to the first issue - however, I will say that I have yet to see a Blu-ray player that does not support all of the currently standard formats for Blu-ray and DVD.

As to the second question, certification by Dolby and/or DTS means that you have their assurance that the decoded PCM conversion to the HDMI output is correct, whether it's in a player, AVR, surround processor, or television. This, in turn, means that there is no loss of quality incurred by sending a PCM signal via a player's HDMI output (instead of the bitstream) to the audio processor in a B&O TV. Consequently, you don't need to worry about loss of sound performance caused by using a PCM stream instead of an encoded one, if the player has been certified (this will be stated in its manual).

cheers

-geoff

PLEASE READ before sending me a Personal Message.

If you have questions about or problems with B&O equipment, these should be directed through your dealer and/or B&O's Customer Service department.

I cannot be a "short circuit", bypassing these communication channels.

Thanks
-geoff

Geoff Martin wrote:

Michael wrote:
I am not sure that all players can decode the signal. And if they do, is it good enough?

I can't speak definitively to the first issue - however, I will say that I have yet to see a Blu-ray player that does not support all of the currently standard formats for Blu-ray and DVD.

As to the second question, certification by Dolby and/or DTS means that you have their assurance that the decoded PCM conversion to the HDMI output is correct, whether it's in a player, AVR, surround processor, or television. This, in turn, means that there is no loss of quality incurred by sending a PCM signal via a player's HDMI output (instead of the bitstream) to the audio processor in a B&O TV. Consequently, you don't need to worry about loss of sound performance caused by using a PCM stream instead of an encoded one, if the player has been certified (this will be stated in its manual).

cheers

-geoff

 

Thanks Geoff for your most calming answer. I have to say, one of the reasons I usually pick DTS when available, is to see the nice piano intro that they sometimes have. But I also feel that DTS sounds better somehow. 

I came to think about another thing, how about if the source material is stereo. Can the V1 make it into fake surround? Like DTS Neo:6 for example, which I use on my yamaha receiver sometimes. I am not planning to use a surround setup with it right now but I think others might want to use all of their speakers when watching movies from TV-broadcasts that usually are in stereo only.

Thanks again!

Cheers,

//Michael

 

 

 

Aren't things getting mixed up a little here..? (the first postings).
One is talking about Beolit 12 while another is talking about Beolab 12...😂

My B&O Icons:

BeoCenter-9500.png BeoCenter-9500.png
Beoremote-Beo4.png Beoremote-Beo4.png
Beovox.png Beovox.png
Beovision-10.png Beovision-10.png
Beosound.png Beosound.png
Beosound-5.png Beosound-5.png
Beosound-4.png Beosound-4.png
Beoplay-S3.png Beoplay-S3.png
Beoplay-A1.png Beoplay-A1.png
Beomaster.png Beomaster.png
Beocenter-2.png Beocenter-2.png
Stefmag5 wrote:

Aren't things getting mixed up a little here..? (the first postings). One is talking about Beolit 12 while another is talking about Beolab 12...

Lol you are right and I completely missed that. I was focused om v1 vs Beolit 12. Bl becomes a bit weird With beolab and Beolit :)
or
BeoWorld Gold Membership card
Join BeoWorld

Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.

Become a Member

December 2026 Prize Draw

Gold Members Only

As a Gold member you're automatically entered into our exclusive prize draw — your chance to win iconic Bang & Olufsen products. A unique benefit of BeoWorld Gold membership, every draw brings a new opportunity to win something special.