I am a B&O fan. There are many B&O fans here on this forum.Yet so much discussion about new products revolves around their tech specs vs. similar, non B&O tech that is either seen as superior or better value.I would submit that B&O NOT being not the latest tech or an attractive value is not the root of B&O’s current market weakness. Rather, it is the lack of product support and in its software.Looking at the B&O vintage market, it is clear that not having the latest tech really doesn’t matter.But having to bin equipment after a few years of ownership does.This is my message to B&O management: Not product lifetime support. But a pledge to open the ecosystem innards to others to correct or carry on the legacy.There’s a lot of brain power out there to do this. And it doesn’t just have to reside in Struer.Discussion.
Thank you to our Sponsors
Please think about the B&O Ecosystem
15 replies
I agree, you agree and we all agree but B&O read these posts and just shrug their shoulders. They either don’t care anymore or are by now simply too poor and under resourced to do anything about it.Iconic product with longevity is not their concern now. They are more concerned with selling little boxes and headphones made in China and forgetting about it after it leaves their warehouse.Look at the inside of a Beogram record player or turntable. Look the old Beocenters. The best components using amazing techniques. My Beogram 7000 and CD7000 still work all these years later. Look inside a BS5 or Moment - cheap underperforming rubbish. You can’t service or fixed 10-20 years from now. Cheap nasty stuff. Buy something from Naim and they will fix it 20 or 30 years later, no problem. B&O aren’t interested in service, care or longevity. They can’t fix software problems without creating more bugs in the process and their recent audiomasters like Beosound 5 and Moment were discontinued after a very short while. Their TV department was shut down so no B&O imaging. Most of their stuff is B&O in name only. Staff the customer department properly and keep it in house. Stop the silly hipster beards. Stop the silly coloured aluminium and qvradrat cloth and different colours every 6 months. Stop bringing out headphones every 5 mins - I’m sinking under the new headphones. It’s a headphone diarrhoea, a headphone tsunami, a headphone monsoon....the world doesn’t need anymore wired or wireless headphones. I can’t keep up with the new buggy TVs coming out every year either. They can’t perfect a current TV. You go to the toilet or turn around and bang! Another TV from B&O.In the end it doesn’t matter. They will read this post and ignore it, ignore you and ignore us.
Can I add - stop making things daft shapes that add nothing just because you can.
My experience has just been the opposite. In the last couple of years, B&O’s hardware and software quality has improved quite a bit - the B&O App is a good example. it is easy to see the ‘other side of the fence is greener’. I have owned Naim and Focal products and they are no better or worse when it comes to quality and support. My current H95 headphones replaced a Focal headphone and the A9 replaced a Naim speaker.
My 2 cents is that B&O needs to cut back a few of their products to focus better. B&O to me has always been about design, lifestyle and audio - all together. They are not perfect, but I do enjoy their products. Building something in China does not make it poor quality. In many cases, Chinese products are at the same or even superior to what comes out of Europe or US.
AfternoonI tend to agree, all my products work really well. I was a little sad when ML died but now with a complete NL system everything just works.I remember in the 90’s or early 2000’s I had loads of problems with different products.I avoided Android stuff like the plague but the LG combo in the eclipse is just fantastic.Being able to upgrade a component and it just works with existing system is great.Yeah there have been problems but it’s just amazing stuff for me at least.I am mainly interested in sound and watching films and the wow factor which the whole system still has.I started with a Beosound 3000 in 1998 and over the years have been frustrated and annoyed at times but the quality is great.Business has to move with the times and sadly our planet is all about more more more consumption of resources and simplicity.I am generally alright having older tech spec if it’s stable, I suppose it’s all about your expectations, I don’t buy new as quite frankly I could afford it but it’s too much in my mind so used means I get to choose stuff a little cheaper and already tested by others.I don’t feel I am missing out because LG has this or Sonos does that, my system works for me.As for the ecosystem as long as NL works in the future and the New NL is backwards compatible it’s good for me.Just my thoughts
Indeed, you do sometimes get the impression that form is given too much priority over function.The Edge being a case in point - very pleasant looking design, but its proper use case is very limited. As evidenced by its lack of success / impact.The Halo too - very nice looking in fact, but so very limited in its function.Can I add - stop making things daft shapes that add nothing just because you can. Ban boring signatures!
The B&O app is a good example of something very mediocre.The cant be class leading in every respect i concede.But what even is the B&O ecosystem?The TVs use LG’s smart platform,, for many of their speakers (both portable and Besound) they were so happy that people were using Airplay and CC for music listening (both single and multi-room) so much that they were already down the road of ditching Network Link. Sharing of the audio from video sources to other rooms has also disappeared in their current TVs.That all aside, you are right re China - too many here cheaply throw around the made in China as a pejorative. Of course, there is a lot of cheap crap made there, but also plenty of stuff to a high standard. Do Apple not make a lot of their phones there?My experience has just been the opposite. In the last couple of years, B&O’s hardware and software quality has improved quite a bit - the B&O App is a good example. it is easy to see the ‘other side of the fence is greener’. I have owned Naim and Focal products and they are no better or worse when it comes to quality and support. My current H95 headphones replaced a Focal headphone and the A9 replaced a Naim speaker. My 2 cents is that B&O needs to cut back a few of their products to focus better. B&O to me has always been about design, lifestyle and audio - all together. They are not perfect, but I do enjoy their products. Building something in China does not make it poor quality. In many cases, Chinese products are at the same or even superior to what comes out of Europe or US. My B&O Home: Beolab 8002 + Beolab 2 + Beosound Core with Essence Remote (Office) Beolab 6000 + Beolab 11 + Beosound Core (Bedroom) Beoplay A9 Mk2 (Living Room) Beosound 1 with wireless dock (Portable) Beoplay M5 (Dining) Beoplay H95 (Focused listening, travel) Beoplay H9 (3rd gen) (retired) Beoplay P6 (Portable) Beotime wall clock (hallway entrance) Beoremote X (poor man's Halo )
The Edge being a case in point - very pleasant looking design, but its proper use case is very limited. As evidenced by its lack of success / impact.
I own an Edge....and barely use it. There aren't many places you can use it, the bass is just ridiculous. And the sound is very odd. The cheaper BeoSound 2 (of which I have two pairs) is a better speaker.
I disagree about integration. I don't need it anymore personally. I love controlling my new B&O speakers with voice. I just think a lot of the older generation don't want to go near this with the fear of learning something completely different, so want control via their remote. Voice control is far better and far more convenient for me.
I can walk around my apartment effectively talking to my various devices. No need for remotes, no need for 'integration' and no need to go back to 1994.
+1B&O might consider to open source at least a portion of the “legacy” systems they have already dropped support, such as PUC codes for BS3 and 4 (especially BS3, it doesn’t make sense anymore that an official B&O dealer has to manually add a PUC code on an old TV), MasterLink specs, Beosound MP3 player etc. I understand B&O cannot give access in areas where there is specific know how, such as audio settings for each BeoLab speaker, video settings on old BV’s, old Beoremote IR frequencies and so forth, but at least they can still give the opportunity to keep their old masterpieces alive by releasing to the public non-essential information in the form of SDK, documents or other preferred form. I am sure there are enthusiasts who would be happy to still use many of the old devices without infringing copyright and without the need to disclose B&O relevant information. Cheers. OlivierThis is my message to B&O management: Not product lifetime support. But a pledge to open the ecosystem innards to others to correct or carry on the legacy.
My B&O Icons:
Somebody needs to confiscate the 3D shapes poster off Kresten’s wall at B&O. 😁 Login to view imageCan I add - stop making things daft shapes that add nothing just because you can. Ban boring signatures!
Please Log In to Reply
You must be logged in as a BeoWorld member to post replies to forum threads.
or
Join BeoWorld
Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.
Become a Member