MMC1 vs Ortofon
1. The 2M range is excellent, but the only one that will match the level of sound quality you're getting from an MMC1 is the top of the range 2M Black. Don't be afraid to shell out for it, though - it is a superb cartridge, full stop.
2. The RIAA units in the Pro-Ject decks are good but not as good as you will obtain from a standalone phono stage. I've not heard the BG4500's RIAA section so cannot comment on how it compares to either
One concern here is that if you do go for a 2M Black, then you'll need a better deck than an entry level Pro-Ject with built-in RIAA to make the most of it. I hate to say but, if you have an MMC1 at the moment, you're going to have to spend quite a bit to better it, even though you won't be hearing it at its very best in the BG4500.
I tried a Shure M44-7 cartridge on a second hand Linn and it was superb for playing old and new records - hardly any background noise, very full sound and a high output. Well worth reading reviews as the Shure was the best cartridge I tried. I had an Ortofon Red on a Proj-ect once and that to me sounded flat. I now have a BG4002 with a restored MMC20CL and that sounds similar to the Shure.
Location: United Kingdom
My B&O Icons:
A matter of taste, I suppose.
I find the Soundsmith cartridges shrill and wearing on the ears like many modern sound systems. Perhaps that's what
the younger people want (or they don't know anything else), but I would prefer a retipped original cartridge anytime.
And then exchange the Beogram 4500 for either the radial Beogram 5000 or the tangential Beogram 8002.
I would take the latter.
Alternatively, a well-restored Thorens-based Beogram 3000 and a fresh SP8.
Martin
Please Log In to Reply
You must be logged in as a BeoWorld member to post replies to forum threads.
Join BeoWorld
Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.
Become a Member