Lab 9's

56 replies

The Babies have arrived, installed and running!

 

The courier arrived with a two man team with this huge plastic wrapped box on a pallet and trolly.

 

Up the stairs, in the apartment, pallet removed and it was time to contemplate the next move as the couriers departed!

 

Huge box, but thank goodness no shipping or other damage - they're faultless, absolutely mint and beautifully finished! :D :D

 

The packaging was excellent and very well thought through to help prevent shipping damage.

 

Not wishing to make mistakes or have a slip/accident damage etc, I really took my time in unpacking and setup, and thought about every move before executing it.

 

Interestingly, all the leads are very good quality - but no sign anywhere of audiophoolery - just good common sense and solid engineering as one would expect from a firm with the reputation of B&O for science lead products and R&D.

 

The speaker outlets on the V1 are all RJ45, 8 pin/8 connector; one plugs in the RJ45 to 8 pin DIN lead into the RJ45 socket on the V1, and the other end into the DIN powerlink socket on the back of the speaker, found after removing a small cover, in which resides the mains socket, switches for left, right, or line, and environmental position - wall, corner or free, as well as another DIN socket to allow daisy chaining to the other speaker; simply set the switches to tell which speaker to play left, and which to play right and you're done.

 

After checking that everything was as it should be, it was time to switch on and setup speaker groups and levels etc.

 

The V1 allows different speaker groups for different functions, turning off or on the relevant speakers as needed, and one can set individual distances and levels as well as combinations of speakers for the different groups saved.

 

The surround sound processor permutations and sound tailoring options are particularly extensive, and far beyond what one finds in a current Yamaha or Sony for example - I can see myself spending quite a bit of time digging down in all the advanced menus later on.

 

To get things running, I setup the default TV group to just use the active speakers in the TV as per usual, i.e. stereo (Lab 9's off); another group I called Cinema with the V1 now configured in this group to be the centre channel, in conjunction with the Lab 9's all running, and lastly, another group I called music, where the Lab 9's run, and the V1's speakers are off.

 

The value of the V1 in terms of the surround sound processor alone is mind boggling - as I've said elsewhere, it has more in common with a professional device than a consumer item - but the payoff is in the flexibility and ease of use once everything's set up and configured, to give maximum versatility and intuitive operation to the lucky owner.

 

So, once set up (which I did with a tape measure for distances and an SPL level meter for matching speaker volumes) one can change between speaker modes at the press of a button, and the speakers just switch on or off as required, and with the relevant distance and level settings preset by the user.

 

I can see though why B&O offer a home visit/consultation to do the setup of their AV systems for the uninitiated though - if you had no prior audio experience or were just clueless, you'd probably want someone else to set it up for you.

 

Audiophile mythology has it that speakers take eons to run in; I've read on B&W literature that the mechanical stresses from manufacture can take approximately 15 hours to settle down, and temperature effects can cause the sound to 'change' for up to a week.  B&W also state that anecdotal evidence that suggests much longer periods of running in, is mainly down to the user getting used to the sound rather than any inherent change in the speaker per se.

 

B&O say nothing about 'running in' at all, and doubtless some of their customers would crank it to the max straight out of the box.

 

However, I like to err on the side of caution, so apart from 65db of pink noise in setup, the first couple of hours I just played some quiet Orchestral (Grieg) at Granny levels for a start, and then after about 3 hours, brought the volume up to still quiet-ish, but otherwise moderate but not loud levels.

 

Fortified with yet more coffee!  I sat through the 2 + hours of my demo playlist that I'd used in the in-store demo and afterwards replayed on the ESSony/SBL system.

 

There's no doubt - I don't think I'll need to be doing much in the way of carefully level matched AB's with the SBL's to pick differences to be honest - unlike amps and CD players the differences are quite marked and obvious - as the sound is in another league again.

 

Similar to what I noted in the shop demo, the resolution is substantially higher, and with it very noticeable gains in clarity, detail and the markedly natural presentation of vocal and instrumental timbre over my now previous ES Sony/SBL system.  This is one very, very natural sounding loudspeaker.

 

Transient response, again as noted in the shop demo, is much more precise and accurate in the way it 'tracks' musical dynamics and with it the sense of involvement in a musical performance.

 

It's very early days; I've had them running for 5 1/2 hours now, and notice some things I didn't in the shop; the top end is exceptionally clear and natural, but no hardness, harshness, glare, grit, shout, edge or excessive brightness to be heard thus far - the sound is exceptionally clear, with outstanding reproduction of tonal timbre, and yet smooth and relaxing to listen to.

 

The sense of bass weight and extension imbues the sound with a sense of majesty and easy effortlessness that the ES Sony/SBL's could never match.

 

I'm finding that even listening at low to moderate levels, the sound has a real sense of scale and presence, and the listening is very involving yet very easy on the ear - there is no sense of listener fatigue after nearly six hours now whatsoever.

 

I'd have to put that down to active operation and the much lower distortion, and the scale and weight in the sound also means the volume doesn't have to be cranked right up to make it sound full and rich - it just is, even though it is idling along.

 

Soundstaging and imagining is noticeably better too, albeit that was never a strong point of the SBL, and with the new speakers crammed in front of the old to listen to them, it won't be until the SBL's are gone and I can set the Lab 9's up properly that I'll hear the full story on that point.

 

So, are they worth the money?

 

Well, as I say, it's only been a few hours, but absolutely.

 

It's hard to put a percentage on an sonic improvement, but I'd say about 30- 40%, perhaps more, over the Sony/SBL's.  It's not as big a jump as it would be if they were Lab 5's rather than Lab 9's, but the combination of the very noticeable and worthwhile improvement in sound, plus the aesthetics and the ability to be rid of racks, and boxes that an active solution brings, adds up to a very high ownership satisfaction quota even given the formidable cost and early days as I say.

 

As the hours of operation build up, I'll gradually start working them harder re the volume, and also will watch a movie or two later in the week time permitting.

 

I've taken some happy snaps with the iphone and put them up on flickr and linked here with a 'guest pass'.

 

I'm sure there's ways to show the pics here directly but its been a long and exciting, albeit tiring day, and I've other technology to interest me at the moment!

 

So that's an early report and some pics; doubtless more to follow..

 

Take care and Best Wishes to all

 

John...

 

Looks/sounds good John! What are you using as as the source for the music through the V1?

As ever - a very thoughtful review.

I think the Beolab 9s might be affordable for me ... but I dream of the BL5s.

Do you think the 5s are 3X as good as the 9s ... or more than 3X in performance ?

 

PS I would really appreciate knowing what tracks you think are good standards to measure speakers by ..................

Wow a very informative write up and i'm  really glad that you like them, i look forward to seeing more pictures and maybe one of the lab9s either side of your v1.

Congrats.

elephant wrote:

 

Do you think the 5s are 3X as good as the 9s ... or more than 3X in performance ?

 

 

That is exactly the question I have. I have 9s and have listened to the 5s several times over the last few years. Have an in home demo scheduled for Wednesday of the 5s. Trying to decide if they really are that much better than my 9s.

 

Great review.

My B&O Icons:

BeoCenter-9500.png BeoCenter-9500.png
Beoremote-Beo4.png Beoremote-Beo4.png
Beovision-10.png Beovision-10.png
Beotime.png Beotime.png
Beosound-9000.png Beosound-9000.png
Beomaster.png Beomaster.png
Beogram-400x.png Beogram-400x.png
Beocenter-2.png Beocenter-2.png
As always a very good and objective review. Nice photos too.

Enjoy you new setup!

Probably my most desirable speaker in the B&O lineup!!

I have often contemplated 3's and 8000's and have listened to both at length and yet never bought either - I would have the 8000's as a musical pair and 3's as a start to a surround system (with always the option to move them to the rear, come better times). And yet........... the 8000's are beautiful but the 9's are funky and significantly better performing. The 8000's & 9's are timeless in design in that they remain unique but, as an Engineer, I love the function driving form of the 9's  - enough said. I can't afford 9's but can't bring myself to buy the 8000's - maybe I'm not listening to the same amount of music that I used to!!

You may have noticed I didn't mention the 5's ................ as majestic as they are, not only can't I afford them but I can't afford the even bigger investment of a house with a room that not only does them justice but also can withstand their "scale". When I can the 9's can sit at the back!🙂

So .......... lotto or redundancy then 9's for me!!🙂

jkhamler wrote:

Looks/sounds good John! What are you using as as the source for the music through the V1?

Hi Jonathon

It's a slow process, but with about 120 discs done so far, I'm gradually ripping my CD collection to my Mac in ALAC, backed up to a time capsule + WD portable HD, and streaming over the network (two Apple Time capsules, two Airport Expresses) to an Apple TV3 connected to the V1 via HDMI.

Sound quality is excellent; zero dropouts, and the ease of use with an iPad etc is exceptional.

My 9100ES Sony CD/DVD/SACD player uses an iLink or IEEE 1394 aka firewire interface twixt it and the digital ES Sony amp, in addition to either SPDIF or analogue outs using it's internal high quality DAC.

I did quite a lot of matched level (with an SPL meter) comparisons in the past between the various connection methods and on both CD and SACD found the iLink connection to offer the best sound.

To my ears (albeit I haven't tried matched volume level AB comparisons) streaming from the Mac to an Apple Airport express connected via toslink to the digital Sony results in sound on par with or better than the iLink interface - in short it's extremely good.

Up till now, I've had the Apple TV3 connected to the V1 by HDMI (bought when I purchased the TV) and have listened to music streamed to it extensively on the V1 - but with the Lab 9's attached to the V1, the system really comes into it's own.  I'm delighted with the sound quality and the combination of ease of use that goes with it.

Kind regards

John... 

 

elephant wrote:

As ever - a very thoughtful review.

I think the Beolab 9s might be affordable for me ... but I dream of the BL5s.

Do you think the 5s are 3X as good as the 9s ... or more than 3X in performance ?

 

PS I would really appreciate knowing what tracks you think are good standards to measure speakers by ..................

Thank you Elephant for your most kind words

That's a difficult one.... I still dream of Lab 5's too, and would have a pair if not for the considerable cost and the need for expenditure on other items in life such as a car etc.

Do I think the 5's are 3x as good as the 9's?

It's very difficult to try and quantify sound quality on a percentage basis.

Provided I had the funds, Lab 5's are sufficiently better IMHO,  that I'd go there, yes.

They've the technical advantage of the ALT lenses being on the midrange as well as the tweeter, they are an active four way rather than three way, on board bass EQ with the measuring microphone, and that 15" bass driver offers bass extension at very low distortion levels that would necessitate the purchase of a state of the art dedicated sub if one was buying separates - such as a Velodyne DD15, or an JL Fathom 13 for example.

For someone like me who is a classical music buff and for whom pipe organ is my favourite instrument, that bass response is almost worth the price of admission alone IMV - AND, there's two of them built into the speaker - no separate boxes required.  Competitive speakers such as the big B&W 800D's don't offer that sort of bass extension without the DSP and formidable power that the Lab 5 can command - again you need the expense and clutter of additional subs.

No, they're devilishly expensive yes, but compared to what the alternatives are, I'd have a pair in a heartbeat had I the disposable funds.

No need to move the 9's on - re-place them to the back of the room as surrounds.

HTH

PS: I might make another thread about recordings...

Kind regards

John... 

 

or
BeoWorld Gold Membership card
Join BeoWorld

Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.

Become a Member

December 2026 Prize Draw

Gold Members Only

As a Gold member you're automatically entered into our exclusive prize draw — your chance to win iconic Bang & Olufsen products. A unique benefit of BeoWorld Gold membership, every draw brings a new opportunity to win something special.