This is the second old thread I've read! How did you guys stumble on these?
Thanks for bringing this back. Excellent reading - specially as I've just been very frustrated with B&O about similar things. I hope somebody was reading... and actually is still reading this.
My problems with B&O are pretty much around interoperability with other systems and that they seem to be falling back on technology. Besides, the design is getting at some points also a little old (BS9000, BS3200) and others are gaining. Just look at the latest TVs from LG (the borderless design with large glass in front of the panel) and I guess Sony and Samsung also have very nice looking TVs. Even though, other manufacturers are putting all kinds of features into the TVs (like skype - which is actually probably great), TV is still more and more just a display. For instance, in Finland, most people are watching digital TV with set-top boxes and while new TVs are having the right kind of tuners, the same will happen with HD TV again. It is a display. And not the center of everything.
Actually, B&O was couple of years ago going into the right direction with the introduction of digital media. However, it is clear that they are not software experts. Unfortunately. Currently the industry has some great standards like DLNA, which is really ubiquitous. With UPnP, the players find the servers automagically. And what is on the servers? Music, pictures, videos. Does that sound familiar. Isn't that BeoMaster 5? Yes, except with proprietary protocols instead of easy to use industry standards. The standards would actually bring nice interoperability. You already have that 2Tb NAS for your computer. All your pictures, music and videos are there. Why duplicate the functionality with yet another really overpriced box. I would actually consider BeoSound 5 if it could read lossless FLAC encoded music from my DLNA/UPnP server. However, now the whole package just becomes too expensive and too cumbersome.
FLAC, BTW is a free lossless encoding that is quickly gaining support from the industry. All new players support that and there are high end music stores (in internet) that sell music with very high quality FLAC encoding (even 24bit and 192kHz). Rather have this than less supported Apple Lossless. (BTW, I'm a mac user...)
So, instead of BS5 + BM5 I'm thinking of having for example Mac Mini with front row. I guess you all know what front row is like. That connected to the screen (TV) and ... suddenly I need the AV-preamp for the B&O speakers that I love (got BL9 on order). Yes, there is BeoSystem 3, but again the price is too high. Well, I have to consider what does the BS3 bring me more than some other system. Design is nice, but let's face it - with all the connections and everything, I'd like to hide it - so I might as well hide something else too.
The problem with integrating everything to the TV is that today, the technology and industry is moving much much faster than 10 years ago. You are stuck with monolithic system where some parts get old, but you cannot replace that part. The first TV that I've been interested from B&O for long time is the new BeoVision 10. Tech at the last years level, when compared to other TVs, which is ok. Currently I still have MX6000, which I haven't upgraded because I haven's seen nice enough and affordable enough TVs until now. (Well, BV10 is still 2 times too expensive...). So, apart from the price, why not get BV10? Well, it contains the surround stuff inside, so it is not future proof as said above. Also, as it is all in one, I should be able to connect everything to that. But, there isn't nearly enough connectors (digi-TV box for recording, DVD/Blu-ray, Wii, Computer) so I still should buy another AV-amp - so much for the all in one. Besides, when I asked the dealer that how I could get Blu-ray to that TV, he recommended Sony ... as B&O doesn't have standalone Blu-ray player. So much for advantages from buying just B&O.
Can I then suggest what B&O should do? Probably not really, however.... 🙂 Of course, from my point of view, I would love to have a controller like BS5 that would support standards like DLNA/UPnP, FLAC and even iTunes (not for me though) and it would therefore not need the B&O branded server. I would also love to see separation of the TVs and the other tech. So make TVs better and update them more often. And make BS3 similarly better to serve everybody (or make 2 versions) and again, update more often. Even though, DNLA/UPnP would enhance the networking capabilities of all B&O products, the whole linking system should be re-tought and implemented with current day computer technologies. Plug everything to the network and have small USB-stick size wireless as option. Include web-servers into the products for easy configuration. And lastly, create nice DACs to go with the speakers. It doesn't work in surround setups, but it would be nice addition to active speakers. Just connect SPDIF from laptop to BL4 to get much better sound quality (like in BL5).
Final note, I've grown up with B&O, I'd like to buy those. But I cannot justify buying equipment that I know will not be future proof and not allow me to access and use my media in flexible manner. Not with these prices. That is why I started my new wave of B&O equipment with the speakers. Well, not really... it was more the design and sound quality of BL9 that was the key. 😁 Now I can wait for B&O to recreate itself together with new exiting and surprising designs!