In a recent thread (“Some thoughts on B&O, Beoworld and life”, I mentioned that I had taken my first tentative steps into vintage B&O and bought a 1979 Beocenter 4000 very cheaply on ebay. Well the beast arrived yesterday, and, apart from some less than enthusiastic comments from my good lady (“It’s arrived then. Well don’t think I’m going to allow that houseroom” - I have a strategy for dealing with such unbridled resistance, but this has yet to be tested for proof of concept!)
Anyway, I had a spare hour, so I attached a mains plug – the very limits of my technical competence – and plugged it in. Lights came on so I thought I’d test a cassette, listening through a pair of Form 2s (No passive speakers). Well, the results were astonishing.
Detail, impact, depth were all excellent (for a cassette, anyway). Speed was stable with no audible wow or flutter. Tried another tape, one I recorded from record over 20 years ago. Same result. And I haven’t even cleaned the heads yet! Tried the same tapes and headphones with my BS 2500, and the sound wasn’t really comparable. Less clarity, almost as if a veil was drawn over the music.
So I tried the FM section – on both Radios 3 and 4 with a lash up aerial arrangement using a B&O rabbit’s ear antenna balanced against some books. Again, excellent, although with a bit of hiss. I’m starting to worry now – can this 30 year old beast sound better than what is to all intents and purposes a current B&O product.
This morning, drag beast to connect to external 10 element FM aerial on roof (I’m serious about radio). Play with presets and settle down to listening to Radio 3 with Form 1s this time . Excellent, full bodied sound no hiss, no drift – really good. Dear old 2500 doesn’t sound as good as this.
I know the BC 4000 has a similar pedigree to the BM4400 beloved by many and that the cassette section has slightly simplified mechanics from the Beocord 5000, but this is 30 years old and hasn’t, from the cosmetic condition of the unit, been particularly well looked after! And I’m not even listening on particularly revealing headphones.
Then I wondered if this reflects not so much the inherent quality of the BC4000 but the poor quality of current B&O headphone socketry as opposed to the old 5mm socket on the BC4000. I know Peter has a very low opinion of the socket on his BC2, and I was wondering if this may be why the 4000 sounds so much better through headphones than my much later vintage 2500.
If not - if the older, classic products from the 70s and 80s such as the BM 4400 and the MS75/100 are really better sounding than the later kit (Forget BL5s and 9s for a minute) would I be better looking to the past for any changes?
I’ve already tracked down a pair of S45.2s on stands to go with the BC4000 (although I may be living in the garage by then). If I could find a good example of a CDX, is it really possible that, for really very little outlay, I could buy something that sounds better than much of the later stuff, active loudspeakers and all? I listen almost exclusively to classical (baroque mostly) and modern jazz. I prefer well balanced, natural recordings and I listen to live music as much as I can.
Any advice, thoughts or experiences would be greatly appreciated.
Cleve