Dear members,
I know, there has already been a thread about the Beolab 3 MK II, which, however, left me somewhat in doubt. So what are the differences between the Beolab 3 MK I and MK II? It was suspected that the MK II version has been "upgraded" because of cost cutting. Sound quality is supposed to be the same nevertheless. Is this the case? If so, are there any other differences in terms of quality or durability? Is MK I or MK II more desirable from your point of view? Any opinions much appreciated. Thanks!
Greetings,
Kai