Do not underestimate the CD50!

I for one prefer it to the CDX. 

chartz wrote:

Do not underestimate the CD50!

I for one prefer it to the CDX. 

But don't forget that it requires the IR board and CD terminal remote (hard to find items) if one wants to use all its capabilities (programming, etc)  as a stand-alone unit used with the BM 8000. Without that, its functionality is very basic. Perhaps that may suffice for some owners.

The CDX is complete in itself.

Regards,

Jean

I used a CDX for the past 8 years with my BM 8000 and have had no complaints. 

Over that time I had a couple of CD50s in the house and yes, they're cool and quirky, but I always preferred the CDX.

I also think the CD50 is best choice. I fits better designwise with its big LED digits. (sounds good too).

For control I use an MCL2AV wich give the possibility to use any of the newer remotes, including the MCP's (maybe not MCP5000).

I also has two way communication so if you use BL5000/7000 or MCP5500-7000 you can also see track-numbers etc.

It also works as an audio input expander, which is good if you have several sources like audio streamers, CD, etc.

I still got my CDX for BM8000 use though I also got the IR code converter kit which allows any data link Beogram CD player to be connected instead.

But the CDX is still playing great since 2008 where it was for scrap really with a broken left hinge and some electronics but thanks to a Beoworld member John Barker and Dillen it was brought back to life.

I only got IR code converter later and noticed the cd input and how that could work.

Thanks everyone, I looked up the CD50 but without wishing to offend its not really my cup of tea style wise. I think maybe the CDX, they seem cheap enough on Ebay.