Millemissen wrote:
There you describe - from a practical point of view - what a BSys4-based audio solution is capable of.
Don’t you miss that with your current setup?
Or is what you gain from the Loewe tv more worth to you than that?
MM
There is a tv - and there is a BV.
Actually, I don't miss these features in my current AV setup: LG OLED with a decent soundbar, on a floor stand that integrates the setup. I do miss the motorized floor stand, though! For music, I use BeoPlay A6 and A8 these days – right now I don't need anything more.
I did indeed marvel at all the options available with BV11, even though I only added a BL11 for the setup. Did I need the full capabilities of the audio engine? No, not for my setup. That said, what Geoff has achieved with the audio engine is truly remarkable. How much you can take advantage of the features depends entirely on your setup.
For a one-point setup (all-in-one AV Center without extra speakers), Eclipse's audio engine's features are overkill. The same is largely true for a 3.0 / 3.1 setup. Even for a 5.1 setup, people seem to be happy with the settings Loewe/Almando offers.
Yes, Eclipse / Avant / BV14 / BV11 would be more feature-rich & capable – IF you need the features. Going beyond 5.1 to larger setups, the audio engine of Eclipse (or other current BeoVisions) cannot be beaten.
And to be clear, I really like the audio part of the Eclipse. I have no complaints about the SoundCenter – I wish there was a standalone version of it! It's the LG C7 plonked on top of the SoundCenter without a hint of anything that BeoVISION used to stand for that ruins the value proposition of the Eclipse for me. And because of that value proposition, the Loewe integration has a competitive edge – which more and more people see as a more sensible choice.