Beolab 5 & 96khz sources

25 replies

Hello,

I have been playing with my Beolab 5s, High Res audio files and a chromecast Audio.   What I did was connect the Chromecast Audio via a TOSLINK->Coax converter directly to the Lab5s.  The lab5s sound great with 24 bit sources but make small clicking noises if the sample rate is 96khz.   48khz is no problem.  Even 88.2khz is not an issue.  But 96khz at either 24 or 16 bit produces the clicks.   

I know the B&O used to say there they supported 96khz but now the specs say 88.2khz.  There was some speculation on this site that it was accidentally omitted.  My testing seems to indicate that the speaker just cannot handle 96khz inputs.  This is a shame since there is some spectacular Hi-res audio coming out at the higher rates.

Has anyone succesfully run 96khz with clean output?

 

--tom

 

I have the same behavior than yours on a BV7-55 (through SPDIF connexion, so using the Beosystem3 DAC). 96kHz files are producing clicking. BTW it seems impossible to find the technical specs of a BS3 regarding this aspect.

I might suspect the Toslink>SPDIF box as well

tom555 wrote:
Has anyone succesfully run 96khz with clean output?

Yes, with exactly the same setup 😂

Did you use a 75 Ohms coaxial cable? (FWIW see this thread here )

And what about the source (file, streaming device) you use?

Barry Santini wrote:
I might suspect the Toslink>SPDIF box as well

I also suspected the TOSLINK->SPDIF converter so I swapped it out for another one.  Same result.  I also swapped cables.  Still clicking. The only two pieces I haven't swapped: the Chromecast Audio and the Beolab5s. 

Oh, and just thought I would add:  I Used Linn Audio reference material.  Looked for clicks in Audacity.  Not there.   Not a source issue.

I couldn’t get high resolution files to play on my BL5.

Whilst I don't have a BL5 (yet) is there a particular reason for 96k playback?

Worst case you can bulk convert your 96k files to 48k quickly, I use XACT on my Mac to convert all sorts of formats. http://xact.scottcbrown.org/

Also 96/2=48 so the sample rate reduction is a very simple operation, as well as I sincerely doubt anyone can tell the difference on finished mastered music. So long as the original is lossless like WAV, Flac, ALAC and so on.

davidr wrote:

Whilst I don't have a BL5 (yet) is there a particular reason for 96k playback?

Yes, indeed —- this way the music industry can sell their products (most often once again) at a higher prize ;-(

MM

Location: Flensborg————Danmark

MM "forgot" to say that 24b / 96kHz is also the maximum amount of data that the BL5s can use (so perhaps to produce the most detailed sound)

CB wrote:
MM "forgot" to say that 24b / 96kHz is also the maximum amount of data that the BL5s can use (so perhaps to produce the most detailed sound)

Right.  This!   I am looking to replace my Beosystem 3 with a digital preamp and my understanding is that the Beolab5 digitizes everything to 24/96 when it comes in.  So rather than having a bunch of resampling or A/D D/A going on, I thought it would be best to feed the Lab5s it's native format.  So far, I'm unsuccessful and may end up feeding them 24/48.

 

--tom

 

or
BeoWorld Gold Membership card
Join BeoWorld

Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.

Become a Member

December 2026 Prize Draw

Gold Members Only

As a Gold member you're automatically entered into our exclusive prize draw — your chance to win iconic Bang & Olufsen products. A unique benefit of BeoWorld Gold membership, every draw brings a new opportunity to win something special.