any thoughts on why beocenter 9300 launched after beocenter 9500 assumes a "lower numeric code - beocenter 9300"
at the cusp of deciding between 9300 and 9500 i would be glad if somebody could help me in the purchase decision
cheers
pattabhi
any thoughts on why beocenter 9300 launched after beocenter 9500 assumes a "lower numeric code - beocenter 9300"
at the cusp of deciding between 9300 and 9500 i would be glad if somebody could help me in the purchase decision
cheers
pattabhi
I own a 9300 from new and I will never part with it. Although they appear very similar, the Beocenter 9300 and 9500 are different.
Only the later examples had the later, so called improved (linear) CD mechanism. Most 9300 appear to have the same CD as the 9500.
I am yet to be convinced that the CD performance or indeed the amplifier is any better in one or the other!
Since 2 way communication does nothing for me, I would probably buy a 9300 from as near to 2001 as possible on grounds of age, reliablity and spares availability
The tape deck in the 9500 is much better specified and the programming on the 9500 can be more complex when used with a two way remote. I think the amplifier is basically the same. In short, the 9500 is better specified but the 9300 is younger. I prefer the mirror finish of the 9500 but would be happy with either.
My B&O Icons:
For what's wurth, the 9500 has a Digital/Analog converter with 16 bit 4 times oversampling and the 9300 has the bitstream technology.
Location: Utrecht
The tape deck in the 9500 is much better specified and the programming on the 9500 can be more complex when used with a two way remote. I think the amplifier is basically the same. In short, the 9500 is better specified but the 9300 is younger. I prefer the mirror finish of the 9500 but would be happy with either.
Agree about the tape deck, totally forgot about that, as I (almost) never use it. The 9300 has the mirror finish too, at least mine has.
I've had a 9500 for almost 10 years (bought it new) and sold it some years ago.
The reason of selling it was the lack of compatiblity with beoport's netmusic and netradio.
It was, imho, the best designed beocenter, but if you want to upgrade, then you're a bit limited.
Location: Utrecht
Earlier 9300's had polished panels and the later ones had matt panels.
Listened to both, connected to Beovox S45-2. They sound very different, perhaps because of a different amplifier. I only listened through beovoxes, so I can't tell if the difference remains when played on Beolabs. Living in 2010, differences in spec's concerning the cassette section are not important to me. Great design however, one of the B&o classics, although I think it's a very large beocenter of which not so much is used when connected to beolabs, in that case there's more drama/appearance than actual content. (no need for an amplifier or cassette, only usefull parts are the CD-player and the radio).
a later 9300 would be better I think, it also uses the Beo4 remote, and just like the Ouverture is a classic, in fact the BM9300 and Beosound Ouverture have a lot in common with each other components wise !
You must be logged in as a BeoWorld member to post replies to forum threads.
Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.
Become a Member