Rob - Danish AV wrote:
does the BL10 use the volume in the cabinet for better sound?
Good question, short answer,- YES!
The BL 10 does go significantly deeper than the BL7-4. It has more than twice the volume and the lower bound is specified at 45Hz vs. 50 for the BL 7-4.
And those 5Hz makes quite a difference. Where the BL7-4 has virtually no bass output, the BL-10 does. Besides the BL-10 carries the triangular signature design of the AV9000, and its built like a tank. The mount is the most complex, insane design I have ever seen and must have cost a fortune to manufacture. I am not sure whether or not it was intentional, but it does fit on a BV 7-40 or 55 stand with only 18 mm to spare if you want to be able to open the DVD tray, pretty cool.
Much to my surprise it turns out that a lot of BV7 setups was sold and operated with the BL7-4 as the only speaker,- go figure.
Another oddity with the BL7-4 is the fact that the sensitivity at least with the BS3, clearly is way off, its simply to loud, and the fact that the centre channel cannot be adjusted is slightly annoying.
Both speakers are outstanding as centres and the lens allows for the entire audience to hear every single detail in the dialog, which in most other setups are muffled. I cant help considering the claims that the Avant or Eclipse carries: "The world best TV sound". Simply not true since they absolutely lack in the centre department. I dont care what anybody says, the centre channel cannot be emulated or substituted, it has to be a single point speaker!
As to the BV-9, it has the specifications of the BL-10 in a BL7-4 sized box, which clearly indicates that the BL7-4 was very much tuned as midrange, dialog speaker. On top of that all three are closed box systems, again leaning towards the properties of a centre speaker. Usually B&O prefers a 2 way bass reflex system, in a 4-5 liter box.
Why B&O decided to abandon the line of what I consider the best centre speaker ever made, is simply beyond me.
