There's so much else in a CD than the platter drive that actually can and does make a difference, even measureably so.
I agree. Personally I would never pay 65k for a cd player, even if I were a billionaire. I think the best value for high quality cd player right now is one from Philips from 80's.
I'm sure one can find a better cd player than that, but at what price, 2k, 3k, 10k? and how much better? A lot? or just a bit?
The problem with high-end hifi industry is that they mix proper engineering standpoints, stuff that can perhaps be just heard, and plain voodoo.
I agree, and that is one reason why I usually stay away from "audiophile" grade stuff. Mcintosh is the exception though. Btw. Mcintosh is not the most expensive brand out there, there are other amps far more expensive than Mcintosh, and I actually prefer the sound of Mcintosh.
Along with the vinyl, they lost one huge point over which to argue (belt vs. direct drive, and the quality of either), so it is only natural that they try to carry it over. I'm sure that Burmeister sounds great, but I firmly believe that has nothing to do with the belt drive, the spikes nor the elaborate suspension...
Even if it has, I wouldn't pay for it, even if I were a billionaire.
Getting back to the charter (and the other topic you started), I believe you would be happy with either a 4000 or 4002. Any of the B&O tangentials will be easy on your rare vinyl since the stylus force is so low. It would be much easier to get a good cartridge for the 8002 which uses a MMCx, though.
Thanks for the heads up.