Search

I went through this dilema some time ago, in the end decided to sell for the following reasons. Beo system 3 cant do 4K and it 'processing abilities did nothing to improve the picture , secondly , the iggest difference is in sound from beosystem 4bases systems- that was the biggest surprise to me Thirdly, maybe you love the frame of the BV4 but why take a slim OLED panel and put it in a product that is super large and cumbersome by todays standards

Button mapper is a sideloaded application for google TV!! It gives you a picture of the google TV remote and how to map each button for a specific purpose, So you can rename the 'netflix button for example https://www.howtogeek.com/693763/how-to-remap-buttons-on-the-chromecast-with-google-tv-remote/ It works on my device perfectly controlling an Avant 55 and google TV with chromecast. Make sure you update the google TV ( a software upgrade came last week, please alsonote the upgrade for the remote

Horrible picture refelctions in the sliver version I saw- the frame is quite deep

[quote user="mbee"] A lot of people are saying that TV tech is moving quicker now than I, the good old years of CRT. While this has been correct in the early 2000’s, I cannot see why a C7 panel is clearly outdated compared to a CX/GX. I’m not sure that everybody complaining about getting the latest panel would see any picture quality difference in real life. For me TV tech is slowing and everything that is new today concerns lower price of manufacturing for the TV brand and

So what one seems to be saying is is only difference between version 1 and 2 apart from a few audio formats is that the panel is upgraded, so in the same way Mk 1 users are stuckwith no upgrade path- so this applies to the mark 2 and yet the price is higher??