jhamers wrote:
This is quickly becoming the most useful series of answers I've ever gotten :-)
So one more questions. The 1611 Converter idea seems to get a lot of love, but why would it be better than hooking up that UFO external sound card directly to the beomaster and connect the chromecast device to that?
Would the sound quality be worse?
Some don’t like (the thought of having) the relatively cheap USB soundcard in the mix.
I would not mind - what I have heard is fine.
The biggest difference is that you need the command A.Aux to open up the port from your linkroom devices.
As I wrote earlier - it depends on the sw version of the Actives/Passives, whether they can manage this.
(This could be tested, but it is most likely that the Actives/Passives have an older sw version, if the installation ist old).
One benefit from using the Behringer is, that you could have an extra device connected there - it has a line in connection (depending on the version).
With the 1611-option you must use a video command to open the port (frrom the linkrooms) e.g. TV....which all versions can.
There is one user case, where the 1611 would be better - if you want to use the BS5 for e.g. radio listening, you could at the same time play through the 1611 to the linkrooms. This would not work with adding the Behringer USB to the BM5.
Hpoe this helps.
MM