TripEnglish wrote:
Not true. Sorry. The less input from amateurs the better.
Noone said focus groups should consist of "amateurs", nor that everything the focus group says should be done, should be implemented. As I said, it's a tool. You know, just like B&O uses "listening panels" which, if anything, is a focus group that have learned how to put what they hear into words. And remember, it's them "amateurs" that walk into a shop and buy their stuff that are the bread and butter of B&O. I'm pretty sure they can't survive if they only sold to audio, broadcast, and pro "film people", even if their top two speakers are excellent.
TripEnglish wrote:
"You an search the parks in all your cities, you'll find no statues of committees."
More fallatious quoting 🤔
The problems with taking quotes like that and put them forward as facts is that they're more often than not taken out of context, they seldomly proves what the poster tries to prove, and they're usually completely fallatious in the context. Instead of quoting such drivel, use arguments instead. Posting a claim and then "backing it up" with an out-of-context quote, is really nothing more than mindless parroting.
But boy, does those quotes sound like they actually have some truth in them, don't they. I bet we can find numerous quotes in the spirit of "Experts. We don't need experts, we are our own experts" and so on. That doesn't mean it's true, nor that everyone is an expert. It's a political statement, just like your quote, Trip.