Greek or not - what's with the aggression? I don't see that as fortright or candid at all. Just stirring the pot? Or arguing over how many angels fit on the head of a pin?
You write: There is no doubt that Beoworld is a serious threat to the official
B&O dealers and while some support it I know most don't. There is
the fear that wrong information is spread through the forum and this
ultimately always comes back to the dealer to have to explain and put
right.
How on earth can BeoWorld be a threat to the official B&O dealers? Wrong information? B&O are free to correct whatever information is entered here, immediately, as are all the dealers. If someone here points out that things could be better, or that a B&O solution may not be top notch, then that information is not wrong -- it may be inconvenient, but it could also be the truth. If not - correct it.
And B&O should thank its lucky stars that someone bothers with BeoWorld. Post a question at the official site and you'll get a pretty useless answer, after a long wait; post it here, and you'll get an informed one in a few minutes - which matches marketing claims against real world experiences. (In comparison, the B&O Wednesday chat sessions that Coolskin likes to post read like an absurd play by Pirandello.)
People are getting their systems working with ten minutes of assistance here, and are often spared having to wait for dealers to come and correct the problem.
This site practises instant correction or emendation. Just the other day I suggested that the Beomaster 6500 was one of the finest amp's in the stackable range, Peter voiced his doubts and raised the 5000 to championship level. That's how an enthusiasts' site works. Evaluate the information, consider it, do what you will with it.
B&O needs BeoWorld -- all premium brands need to have a strong and enthusiastic fan base, often critical and often reverential of what the brand's up to. Any brand that thinks it can operate in today's web connected world without giving its fans an independent voice is doomed to a hard time.
And isn't your example, which I have quoted above, actually the very proof you seek that BeoWorld is independent of B&O?
(Written by someone who's had extensive dealings with and contacts with B&O, but who is not presently directly involved with the company!)