Stonk wrote:

I would think that to remember the controls would be much clearer than the size of the unit.

that is going on my tombstone.

burantek wrote:

Stonk wrote:

I would think that to remember the controls would be much clearer than the size of the unit.

that is going on my tombstone.

😁

Does the Beogram 6000 make sense with the Beomaster 4400? Don't know the connections, but wasn't the Bg6000 quadraphonic? And made for this:

I guess the Bg6000 can be used in standard stereo-mode. Someone will know.

And according to BeoCentral, the Beogram 6000 with the radial arm came in 1982, which is too late for Whitefang's purchase.

soundproof wrote:

Does the Beogram 6000 make sense with the Beomaster 4400?

i was thinking the same thing, but perhaps there was a deal to be made at the time on a 6000???

whitefang could have had any of the tables from that "family" 400x - 6000...

the mystery continues! 😂

We were attentive to any mistake when we have built the site, and the product database. Do not hesitate to report us any mistake you find.

Welcome to the club 

Any future references to sex, drugs and pink floyd are more than welcome :-)

I need to replace Dark side of the Moon, thanks for the reminder.

BG 6000 Quad could definitely be used in stereo only mode, so perhaps there was a deal to be done on this deck at the time the OP purchased it. I have a 4002 and this must be the deck refered to as it has the stainless 'tabs' mentioned by the OP.

Incidentally I have my 4002 hooked up to my BM 6000 Quad. I wonder if the OP could have a look at the photo below and confirm whether his deck looked like the one in the shot:

OK, I will concede the turntable may have been designated as 6000, ( thanks for the photo ),  but will go to my grave insisting the reciever was designated 4500.  At least I recall it from the literature I retained for several years( but have lost track of, as I have moved five times since ownership) and yes,  the 6000 and the 4500, 4400, or whatever made perfect sense.  The only thing that didn't make sense was the S-60 speakers I bought for it.  A speaker available I can best recall as designate M-100 would have been a better choice,  but placement restraints wouldn't allow their acquisition. Same reason I gladly bowed out from buying the 3300 reciever, if indeed I got THAT model number correct.  I'm just glad to be able to lay my eyes, even if only online, on those wonderful peices of sound equipment!

Whitefang

PS:  Incedentally,  A friend suggested that maybe the dealer fudged all the info to be able to sell older stuff at a new price,  as one appliance store tried to do to me with a washer and dryer.  But it was purchased at Alma's Hi Fi in Dearborn, MI, probably the most reputable sound dealer in the Detroit area.

Tim and Nick Jarman have just published a book about collecting B&O.
link

Here's the link at Tim Jarman's site to the Beomaster 4400: link

j0hnbarker wrote:

BG 6000 Quad could definitely be used in stereo only mode, so perhaps there was a deal to be done on this deck at the time the OP purchased it. I have a 4002 and this must be the deck refered to as it has the stainless 'tabs' mentioned by the OP.

Incidentally I have my 4002 hooked up to my BM 6000 Quad. I wonder if the OP could have a look at the photo below and confirm whether his deck looked like the one in the shot:

W O W !  !  !  !

Absolutely beautiful shot of your 4002 and 6000

j0hnbarker wrote:

BG 6000 Quad could definitely be used in stereo only mode, so perhaps there was a deal to be done on this deck at the time the OP purchased it. I have a 4002 and this must be the deck refered to as it has the stainless 'tabs' mentioned by the OP.

Incidentally I have my 4002 hooked up to my BM 6000 Quad. I wonder if the OP could have a look at the photo below and confirm whether his deck looked like the one in the shot:

W O W !  !  !  !

Absolutely beautiful shot of your 4002 and 6000