$50,000        Beovision Harmony

$ 85,000       Beosound 90

$ 50,000       Beosound 50

========================

$185,000       Total (USD)

 

I wonder how that compares to global housing prices.

Hiort wrote:

Think the ”Bronze” finish on the stuff looks stunning. Agree it’s not everyones setup with BL50 as rears 😎.

Woaw! That's the first time I see a B&O official picture with the speakers connected to the mains!!!

While great to see B&O still making TVs, there are so many compromises here that boggle. 8K, HDR is wonderful, so why not pair it with Atmos and more modern sound formats?

Give me a 'proper' BS5 any day! 

mbee wrote:

Hiort wrote:

Think the ”Bronze” finish on the stuff looks stunning. Agree it’s not everyones setup with BL50 as rears 😎.

Woaw! That's the first time I see a B&O official picture with the speakers connected to the mains!!!

And it doesn't appear the TV needs cables!

kuyttendaele wrote:

“Finally here...” would have been my reaction to an Eclipse v2 or another B&O TV in the 40” to 55” range.

I agree!

These aren’t just halo products.

They’re hail marys.

The last thing B&O needs to stay in the game is hail marys.

B

boskonay wrote:

While great to see B&O still making TVs, there are so many compromises here that boggle. 8K, HDR is wonderful, so why not pair it with Atmos and more modern sound formats?

Give me a 'proper' BS5 any day! 

My LG OLED B9 65" can output Atmos, so I assume GX does too. A waste that the Soundcentre does not provide the possibility to add height speakers.

9 LEE wrote:

Is it just me, or is that yet another truly awful photograph?

BeoLab 90's would never be in that position. The two random chairs look ridiculous, and the Harmony looks lost (and at a terrible angle) too!

People who want an 88" Harmony will know their stuff, surely? When will B&O hire photographers who can appeal to people with real homes, and real setups.

Thankfully, there are no vacant looking hipsters present. That's a positive at least....

Yes, you certainly wouldn't get good audio results from that layout.

I have pretty much the same system at home, except I have a BeoVision 4-103 instead of an 88" Harmony.

My listening position forms an exact equilateral triangle with the Lab 90s: my dealer and I laid it out down to the centimetre using tape measures.

What's the point of spending all that many and then not using the technology to best effect?

Do people forget that the LG part is the most expensive? The b&o bit barely changes from size to size in terms of pricing.

Well, the Eclipse Sound Center 65 is 46% more expensive than the 55 - this makes NO sense! The Harmony Sound Center 65 has the same price as the 77 (can't find the 88s price) - which is twice the price of the 55 Eclipse Soundcenter.

think that a 5-10% higher price for a larger size would be fair. Once again I say that I would happily pay the list price for a 55 Eclipse Sound Center (without the awful black (glass?) piece below the speaker, and the need for an expensive wall mount). I would not like to pay the list price for the 65/77 Harmony Sound Center for a 55 LG CX...