BV 7-32 MK3 v BV7-40 MK2

3 replies
C(
Offline
Compostela (archived)
Bronze
Posted May 26, 2011 at 16:03 GMT
#1931915

Hi folks.

Apart from the obvious dimensions issue, is there any difference in picture quality or functionality dbetween the BV7-32 Mk3 and the 7-40 Mk2? Both sets are from 2007 so I assume that there is no difference but I would be grateful for any views.

Thanks.

C

MO
Offline
moxxey
BronzeFounder
Posted May 26, 2011 at 18:38 GMT
#1931916

The BV7-32 MK3 has a good screen for standard definition TV as the pixel count is higher due to the size of the screen. 

The BV7-40 MK2 was a good TV for standard definition TV as it pre-dates the 1080P screen that appeared in the MK3. However, HD might be an issue, particularly as there is only that poor single DVI input. Effectively, it's not really a long term TV choice for me. BV7-40 MKIV upwards is the best option. MKIII displayed blacks poorly and struggled with shading.

BTW do remember the biggest difference is the size of the screen. Once you've owned the 40", the 32" seems tiny in comparison.

C(
Offline
Compostela (archived)
Bronze
Posted May 27, 2011 at 03:43 GMT
#1931917
Thank you Moxxey. Are the panels in both sets the same given that they both come from 2007?
or
BeoWorld Gold Membership card
Join BeoWorld

Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.

Become a Member

December 2026 Prize Draw

Gold Members Only

As a Gold member you're automatically entered into our exclusive prize draw — your chance to win iconic Bang & Olufsen products. A unique benefit of BeoWorld Gold membership, every draw brings a new opportunity to win something special.

View Prize Go For Gold