burantek wrote:

Είναι όλα τα ελληνικά μου!

LOL. It's all Greek to you….but Google translate is not always perfect. Nice try though Jaff!! 🤒😁

DrDimitris wrote:

burantek wrote:

Είναι όλα τα ελληνικά μου!

LOL. It's all Greek to you….but Google translate is not always perfect. Nice try though Jaff!! 🤒😁

It's all Greek to me too! 😁

I don't think it would be unfriendly at all.  I think they would compliment each other well as we are a local forums and Beoworld and Beocentral, et al. are international and more established forums.  On the one hand, we like to hear about local deals, meet up to hear each other's setups and layouts and learn about local remedies (how to change your products from 110v to 240v, where to get fabric replacements for pentas, etc...)

fyi, we have had a link to your site for close to 4 years now as your site and beocentral have so much useful (especially technical) information filled with years of experience and knowledge.

the purpose for an Asia forum would be to unite regional (Asia as a region) members, knowledge, experiences, etc...

As per the article recently posted on B&O's future direction, Asia is indeed booming and I see B&O thriving throughout the region much more so than in other parts of the world that I visit.  obviously, I don't know sales figures or usage figures throughout the world, but i would suspect that Asian users are one of the fastest growing markets for B&O and I would assume, like myself and our forum members, that we all have experiences to share, questions to ask, etc...

sorry to drag this out... ultimately it's your decision but just thought i'd share my opinion.

I don't have a problem with this at all and you make some perfectly reasonable and well thought out points. My only concerns are with the amount of activity the forum will see. I will put up the poll - are you happy with the question asked?

bayerische wrote:

I think we should shrink the amount of forums...

...

Since english would be the language of choice for the Asia forum, then why isn't the general forum enough? It has the most visitors, and posts, the odds of a topic will flourish there is the highest.

...

Completely agree. As I see it the specific forums are in other languages (German, US ;-) etc.) OR for special interest (workbench, for sale etc.).

For me an Asian subforum doesn't make any sense...

Ralf

well noted.  

Under Beoworld North America the description is as follows:

The North American market differs slightly from that in Europe. For those in Canada, Mexico and the USA, this forum will help resolve those differences and answer your questions.

I would like to note that Asian models differ significantly more than North American models both in terms of regional coding, input/output language, product availability and launch dates, etc...  How would that be different from having a separate North America forum?  it may just be the devils advocate in me...

The US models really are very different - the use of the NTSC video system and usually completely different connections on the back of the sets along with US only products accounts for this - as stated before. Asia will have some regional differences but essentially uses much the same as Europe, the Middle East and Oceania. However I am happy put a poll on but there will need to be a reasonable pro vote! My own view is that the General Forum will on the whole garner more responses - our active Australian members use it as much as anyone.

Doctor,

you wrote in the poll:

"The forum would be in English unless there are strong views regarding this. I would suggest that votes should really be cast by those this would affect so we can see how many members would be interested in this. there will need to be a reasonable number to make this viable!"

I guess it does affect everyone since asian members might prefer there subforum and "move" activity from the general forum...

Usually I follow the gerneral forum (more seeking advice) and the german forum (more giving advice) but I don't like to see how members post the same questions in both forums....

Ralf

Frankly the only time I even look which subforum I'm on is when I start a new topic. While reading, I use almost exclusively the "not read" function and just go through interesting topics, no matter where they are or what language they are in as long as I'm able to read it.

Given that, even the North American subforum makes no difference to me; it is sometimes helpful to assess where a poster might be located, and even that would be unnecessary if people bothered to at least include a continent in their personal profiles.

Apart from the few non-English subforums we have, I'd much rather see division by topic as it mostly is now. The Workshop, Vintage and Beogram subforums work well in my view, and probably deserve their isolation because the majority of the readers don't seem interested in them (judged solely on the count of views they get).

The current non-English subforums seem to deserve their existence and indeed have quite a few active members that never write in English. But if you want to use the same idea for an Asian subforum, which language is it going to be in? Korean, Thai, Lao, Japanese, any one of the major Chinese dialects, Australian?

But if enough people want an Asian subforum, it is of course fine with me - but in my personal use case, it'll be just as if the same topics had been posted in the general forum or a relevant, current subforum (see paragraph 1...) to begin with. There's no reason why I would want them somewhere else.

How about just inserting an "Asia" or some such prefix in the topic if you really think it is not interesting to the rest of the world? If the traffic proves to warrant it, I'm sure a new subforum can be set up.

iiiRshad Khan wrote:

FRom India

ANd i want Hindi Forum exclusively for indians

Perhaps I'm taking your post the wrong way, but I find it disturbing to be honest.

English is the official language in India, and nobody has set up a forum here that excludes you in any way whatsoever.

So why do you wish to have one set up for quote: "exclusively for Indians"? - this smacks of a racist element I find disturbing and objectionable.

If I have misread your post, or am taking it the wrong way, I apologise in advance, but as written I find its' tenor disturbing.  

Perhaps you could clarify your views a little better?

Respectfully

John...