BEOVISION ECLIPSE

2469 replies
......

Michael wrote:
For now I'm considering if I should keep my Avant &a speakers or sell all B&O and get something else.

Regrettably Michael I very much agree with your sentiments. I sold all my remaining B&O including a BeoSound 9000, BeoVision 9, BeoLab 9s, BeoSound 8, H5 headphones, BeoSound 3 (constant problems) and a load of BeoComs including 6000s and 2s. I had other B&O products before these but they were with me for many years so not included in my 'relatively short-term' ownership. Looking back I think the 2 products that bought me the most happiness every time I looked at them or used them were the BeoSound 2300 (that lovely sliding glass magic with lights) and of course the iconic BeoSound 9000. I lived with the great BeoLab 8000s for many years too and they were fantastic with an older Avant 32" RF DVD. The 80s and 90s were pure B&O magic for me.

I really don't think I am going to end up buying the Eclipse. I'll be looking at Loewe, Sony or LG now I think, which is a shame in many ways. I agree with a previous poster who suggested that this partnership serves LG much better than it does B&O. I imagine LG are laughing all the way to the bank.

Michael wrote:
Somehow I get the feeling they will sell the sound bar on it's own. On B&O manchesters video it's easy to spot the label on the speaker saying the name SoundCentre as it would be its own device. On a Bv11/14 it would say Beovision on the same spot.

But if they did that, surely the bar wound have to have a retail of £3000 - and who on earth would buy that? I know someone who went to buy the Bose soundbar at £599 and was shocked at that price.

Also, I very much doubt you can just drop in any old TV in to the bar and connect it up and it works seamlessly.

Agreed, and what interface would you use?

Something (a remote? and app?) to control the Beosystem 5.

And then a separate remote to control the TV and its UI.

Possible i guess, can't quite get my head around it though - anyway, unless it happens i won't lose sleep over the question.

 

I wonder, if there is no B&O in the Eclipse aside from the speaker, does this mean the TV has no pin code protection either? Curious.

moxxey wrote:

But if they did that, surely the bar wound have to have a retail of £3000 - and who on earth would buy that? I know someone who went to buy the Bose soundbar at £599 and was shocked at that price.

Also, I very much doubt you can just drop in any old TV in to the bar and connect it up and it works seamlessly.

It probably would be something like that, with the aluminum grille at least. If one buys the eclipse that's bundled in the cost. I don't remember what the BeoLab 7.4 cost but I'm sure it was quite a lot too and still without any other electronics than amps.

I think a SoundCentre could be a great idea for B&O because it makes their expensive speakers useable for more people without making them buy a B&O TV.

The Centre probably mainly consists of a HDMI switch, audio processor and puc controller. It can drive both cabled and wireless speakers.

It has what's necessary to control external devices, connect B&O speakers and switch sources. It probably lacks video processing and it's own GUI but a separate edition could have this as well and just rely on a dumb tv or projector for video output.

It does not contain Netflix or those things though and they are sent back from the connected tv (audio over hdmi arc). Most TVs can do this.

I guess the BeoRemote could be though to tackle but a combination of HDMI-CEC, Bluetooth and puc would make it possible I believe.

Truly the price is high but if you buy BeoLabs I don't think it's horribly high.

As the eclipse has dolby vision,has it also hdr10/hi log gammer hlg ?

moxxey wrote:
Also, I very much doubt you can just drop in any old TV in to the bar and connect it up and it works seamlessly.

But why wouldn't it be possible to put the PUC control into a sound bar to control a separate panel of any make  above?

I agree on the pricing issue though.

How long will Bentley and Rolls Royce be able to differentiate themselves from their bread and butter owners as standard components creep in? At some point they will have just the same issues to address. It's all a question of scale. I remember a colleague driving an 1970's Aston Martin that had door handles from an Austin Allegro and lights from a Vauxhall. Acceptable, but acceptable if the Aston Martin was, say, 50% Austin/Vauxhall?

Once the video engine has just become the standard panel manufacturer's product, there's only the sound bar left to call B&O. Not enough!

Graham

Given that all this years LGs support all 4 HDR formats, i see no reason why the Eclipse would be different.....I know the Panasonic is more limited and won't get Dolby Vision, but they've gone down a different path.

Just turned on my bedroom V1-40 that also has a metal grille. And subwoofer.

It turns on with a nice animated logo. Fades in picture with curtain and turns on my IPTV box without any graphics. No distractions. I can change sources with just a small animated black row on top that fades in and out with the white Bang & olufsen font.

It does everything discretely and elegant. I navigate it with a satin finish BeoRemote one without any logos except their own.

It has a floor stand, a table stand, a wall mount of excessive quality (as the other stands) and even a roof hanging mount. The entire Tv cost a fraction of the other Beovision models but is truly a gem.

If they can produce something this elegant and brought together for the new price of around 3000 usd then why not with Lg?

Sure Oled is awesome but the interface is what you notice every day. I turned off my Avant before going to bed and just seeing the curtains move in, no extra annoying graphics or anything is just the perfect touch after a long day at work.

I find it very worrisome that they didn't work more with LG on the interface. I do not think it is unobtrusive enough.
By statements in the various articles of the B&O/LG partnership, they are looking to deepen and improve it.

BeoVision Eclipse is their first love-child (some have called it the Frankenstein). By all indications, there will be other BeoVisions B&O and LG will collaborate on.

I think – and hope – that they are committed to a steep learning curve, taking in both the good and especially the critical feedback they are receiving for the Eclipse. This thread alone has a lot of input, and ideas for improvement, for B&O to consider:

- build quality (consistency of the materials in the joint audio and picture elements), pointed very well out in Michael's post.

- designing a B&O skin for the WebOS user interface (I was actually expecting at least some rework on this), asked for in a lot of posts.

- ensuring that the day-to-day operation has a consistent B&O feel to it, including the hallmark electronic curtains, i.e. getting it all together with the B&O dna, honoring their heritage.

It is disheartening that the video department at B&O is dead. Their sensors and the Vision Clear processing were superb on the BV11, and to great extent on the pre-Android Avant (I think UHD and HDR threw them off their game somewhat, and choosing TP Vision as a supplier was a gigantic mis-step). I wish they would carry on the best of their Video Engine – the knowhow that B&O developed for decades – over to LG. Or is the knowhow gone with people that were let go?

I still like the Eclipse's design (I may be in the minority), but the mix&match of skimmed B&O and raw LG makes me wonder if the whole is greater than, or even equal to, the sum of its parts – also in terms of price.

I am undecided.

......
or
BeoWorld Gold Membership card
Join BeoWorld

Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.

Become a Member

December 2026 Prize Draw

Gold Members Only

As a Gold member you're automatically entered into our exclusive prize draw — your chance to win iconic Bang & Olufsen products. A unique benefit of BeoWorld Gold membership, every draw brings a new opportunity to win something special.