@Millemissen
Don't be sorry, just try to be more respectfull, don't argue like a kitchen salesman who is seeing that he will not finalize his deal
Let's all behave.
@Facel, I think what MM was trying to get across is that B&O have a very good and tailored video and audio engine that is designed to give a much better video and audio package than some other manufacturers. Integration with other devices is improving, connectivity to B&O's own equipment, multi room, placement options etc, etc is possible, WISA and so on.
LG and B&O are in different markets. That doesn't make one any better or worse than the other in my opinion. They are just different. I still don't like that rectangular window at the bottom no matter how good the picture may be.
Dave.
That is pretty much how I feel about it.
After all, what I am interested in, is the overall concept behind the B&O devices.
To me that is at a level, that by far is not reached by any other manufacturer (of A/V gear), no matter how good the picture of an OLED tv is, or how intriguing it might be to have a soundbar beneath it.
When it comes to choosing, I would rather live with the superb FullHD picture/screen and the exceptional audio solution of a BV(11), than with an OLED 4K tv (of todays standart) with a wanna-be surround sound solution in a box connected to it.
This is not about behaving or not.
This is about the overall experience, you can have from a B&O setup, which - i thought - we as Beoworlders should applaude.
I am perfectly fine with someone not caring for it - that is his choice..
But after all this is a B&O forum - and we were discussing a 'BeoVision 11 replacement'.
MM
Location: Flensborg————Danmark