The v1 and its ikea like flat pack back is an atrocious bit of design.
I have to agree with flappo,regarding the v1,picture and sound quality aside,it looks cheap and is a copy of loewe connect.
I understand the v1 is a entry model, like the mx and beovision1 and 3 were,but at least they looked crafted and built to last ,and looked classy with their full glass fronted screen,which you get on the beovision 7 etc.
,Thats one of the things I loved on beovisions was the ease of cleaning and elegant looks of a one piece glass front,which is the only thing I dislike about my bv5,the screen is a nightmare to clean.
Personally I think a B&o product should have aluminium and glass as part of the design,especially aluminium,as its part of there design history and sets them apart from the rest ,with theire silver plastic built tvs.
I know I mentioned avants alot,but at the time they were truly worth there price tag,with the aluminium rotating base,bmw car paint ,full glass fronted contrast screen,the list goes on.It was streets ahead of the competition,in sound,picture and build quality.Along with most of the product line during this time.
I never liked the beovision 8 design either,looked cheap.I think beovisions should have a full glass front like avant,bv6,bv7,bv11 etc.They should have kept the beovision/beocenter 6 in the range and made 32/40" versions.
I understand why the beoplay range has been added,but personally only like the a8 which I have,which has more of a b&o mainline design to it,as it was originally designed as a beosound product .
Jacob jenson and god rest his soul david lewis,have designed the best products,and have put b&o were they are today in design terms,with icons being in the range for years and still holding there own in this day and age.
B&o need another designer with the same design principles of these great men,but also a budget to allow the use of better materials,like the good old days.
Just my humble opinion