Beolab 4000 vs. 17

61 replies

The Mk 2 use the amplifier from the Beolab 4 - slightly dodgy design in my view, not the same as the bigger speakers. I have two sets of Mk1 4000s - a blue set and a gold set - both brilliant and no problems with either. When I went round Struer, 4000s are in just about every room - clearly because they are cheaper but also because they can be put almost anywhere and sound good. Don't know what they have these days - Geoff?

My B&O Icons:

BeoCenter-9500.png BeoCenter-9500.png
Beoremote-Beo4.png Beoremote-Beo4.png
Beovox.png Beovox.png
Beovision-11.png Beovision-11.png
Beotime.png Beotime.png
Beosound-Stage.png Beosound-Stage.png
Beosound-Moment.png Beosound-Moment.png
Beosound-5.png Beosound-5.png
Beosound-2.png Beosound-2.png
Beoremote-One.png Beoremote-One.png
Beoplay-Portal.png Beoplay-Portal.png
Beoplay-Earset.png Beoplay-Earset.png
Beomaster.png Beomaster.png
Beolit.png Beolit.png
Beogram-400x.png Beogram-400x.png
Beocenter-2.png Beocenter-2.png

Peter wrote:

The Mk 2 use the amplifier from the Beolab 4 - slightly dodgy design in my view, not the same as the bigger speakers. I have two sets of Mk1 4000s - a blue set and a gold set - both brilliant and no problems with either. When I went round Struer, 4000s are in just about every room - clearly because they are cheaper but also because they can be put almost anywhere and sound good. Don't know what they have these days - Geoff?

Interesting Peter, and one of the reasons it's good to have the forum here, I'd not heard about the problems with the BL4000 and IcePower amps. I know that, outside of reliability, a lot of the things I hear said against IcePower has more to do with the typical audiophile view of if it ain't a class AB old style amp, preferably with tubes, it has to be evil incarnate. But reliability is an important consideration. Given that, and the price, I'd go with MkI's personally, and if boomy adjust the bass.

I love them wherever I've seen them, on a shelf, on floor stands, mounted on the wall (stunning on each side of a BS9000 or such). I had a pair for evaluation briefly when I was deciding between them and the BL8000. They sounded amazing, but the 8000 had better bass and were better suited for my listing in the room I had, but it was a close thing as the 4000s sounded very good and would have been easier to sit on the mantle. Ultimately I decided to arrange the room differently and mantle mounting was not important. Stunningly good looking speaker though, after looking at small box speakers for decades, the graceful leaf shaped cabinet design just blew me away.

Someday I'll pick up a used pair.

Hi Jeff, the 17's were made out of the 4000's, so how can you say it's ugly? In Design wise, they just differentiate it a little bit. And they sound way better than the 4000's. I don't see it ugly at all. Maybe, the only thing ugly about it is the Price but not the Speaker itself.
jowus wrote:

Hi Jeff, the 17's were made out of the 4000's, so how can you say it's ugly? In Design wise, they just differentiate it a little bit. And they sound way better than the 4000's. I don't see it ugly at all. Maybe, the only thing ugly about it is the Price but not the Speaker itself.

The thing is that the new ones, while aesthetically appealing, in no way possess the effortless elegance of the 4000.

In terms of size they are similar, but the shape makes all the difference to me.

🙂 de gustibus EST disputandum
Jeff wrote:

Interesting Peter, and one of the reasons it's good to have the forum here, I'd not heard about the problems with the BL4000 and IcePower amps. I know that, outside of reliability, a lot of the things I hear said against IcePower has more to do with the typical audiophile view of if it ain't a class AB old style amp, preferably with tubes, it has to be evil incarnate. But reliability is an important consideration. Given that, and the price, I'd go with MkI's personally, and if boomy adjust the bass.

I love them wherever I've seen them, on a shelf, on floor stands, mounted on the wall (stunning on each side of a BS9000 or such).

Thanks for the clarification, PK, Beobuddy, Peter and Jeff.

I am going to find one or two nice pairs in the Mk 1-iteration and hope the foam is in good condition.

Any suggestions on how to make sure this is the case without taking the speakers apart?

I gather that temperature fluctuations and humidity play a part in the deterioration .

Thanks again!

jowus wrote:
Hi Jeff, the 17's were made out of the 4000's, so how can you say it's ugly? In Design wise, they just differentiate it a little bit. And they sound way better than the 4000's. I don't see it ugly at all. Maybe, the only thing ugly about it is the Price but not the Speaker itself.

How can I say it's ugly? Well, I didn't say ugly, I said the 4000s were better looking, to me. But how can I say it. It's easy. It's ugly! See how easy that was? 😎 Actually, I do think the 17s are unattractive, and don't find the materials they are made of as attractive as the 4000s. Sonically, I think they are better, but better than say a used pair of 4000s with a BL11? At a lower price? That would be superior in my opinion, your ears may differ of course.

I seem to have read about issues with the power switch on some of the MK 1 models.  Was this the case?  I know the MK 2 did away of the power switch and just have the status light.  I will see if I can find those threads, but I do not have much luck with the search function.

 

I don't have a pair of Beolab 4000's, but I believe that the easiest way to inspect the foam is to unclip the speaker grill and remove the tweeter from the front by removing the two screws. If the foam is black, then it is probably original, as the replacement updated foam is white. Removing and changing the foam requires the speaker to be dismantled.

I don't know the percentage rate of foam failure, but the problem also applies to the Beolab 8000.

o hear the BL4000 and BL17 side by side. But, I do feel the BL17 is an ugly duckling compared with the BL4000, which is still to me one of the most beautiful Beolabs ever made, right up there with the BL8000.

Hi Jeff,'

When I first saw the 17's, that's what I thought, but, after listen to it and seeing it few times, I love it them the most. I owned the 4000, and I don't have the need for 17's, but the size of it and the sound, I'll get it in a heart beat if I need one. Trust me is just a redone of the 4000's, the same as the 8000's being 18's now and 9's being 20's now.
Beolab 4000 shares form factor with BL17 which is the obvious replacement. The BL17 is much much improved in every way. The sound is impressive for such a small speaker and certainly price wise in the beolab range. The design with the circle can be discussed but it looks much more recent than BL4000 does. Bl4000 sounds okey but not good enough in lows. Most speakers sounds good with a subwoofer added. If you have a BL2 sure go for whichever speakers you want. If you don't want a subwoofer go for BL17 or something else better for full range on its own. They are great at it and they also have wisa and toslink. I think the bl4000 looks a bit dated but still beautiful. And very heavy(!).
or
BeoWorld Gold Membership card
Join BeoWorld

Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.

Become a Member

December 2026 Prize Draw

Gold Members Only

As a Gold member you're automatically entered into our exclusive prize draw — your chance to win iconic Bang & Olufsen products. A unique benefit of BeoWorld Gold membership, every draw brings a new opportunity to win something special.