Puncher wrote:
In the case of the BS8 however, there would seem to be 10's of thousands who disagree!
But maybe THAT is the problem for B&O. A bit like "A" levels in the UK education system; what we have today is not as good as yeater-year?
As a Layman to the technicalities I would comment as such:-
Most adore the iPod, for one, it holds your music conveniently.
But is it the best quality device out there or just convenient?
Do we buy it for "features", "audiophile quality" or that it can be owned relatively inexpensively?
How much music is kept on people’s iPod/PC's at inferior bit/sample rates, that we dont notice or care about?
How many people play their iPod/Mac/Computer music through high-quality amplifiers or loudspeakers - most want cheap and easy.
How many recording studios alter the sound of CD masters and internet music releases so it sounds good on those little white ear-phones rather than a top-end system?
How can a $300 PC with a CD/DVD/BR rip a CD as good as the original CD?
How can the software algorithm ensure accurate playback?
I see the problem not as B&O getting more and more expensive. I see the problem as other manufacturers becoming more and more inexpensive - with a pseudo trait at becoming better. There is a flock mentality, a gravitas to this current culture just perhaps as in the 60's, 70's and 80's the gravitas was for more audiophilic qualities. I feel we have indeed "dumbed-down" and gone cheap. B&O's problem in my mind is they have taken a long time to realise where the market is going/gone (somewhat counter-intuitive to them perhaps - and just like Kodak) and they struggle to find buyers for their products because a) they are too expensive, b) they are not made in Denmark, c) the new delivery systems are retro-progressive.