The posting guidelines say no profanity is to be used and offending posts are will be deleted. I would respectfully suggest to the moderators that the preceding post and the manner in which it uses the name of God and Christ is innapropriate and would ask that it be deleted.

I was merely appealing to a religious deity for action to be taken, as it is becoming more and more apparent that an appeal to certain posters is going unanswered.

I'd hardly think that calling God "good," or for invoking an action from Christ is "profane."  Frankly, I didn't even say for any action to be made in the SAKE of Christ--which, I suppose, if you want to nitpick, you could misconstrue as "profane."

See profane: pro-fane:  2 : to debase by a wrong, unworthy, or vulgar use 

Nothing's being debased here, it's relatively hard to argue that anything said was particularly "vulgar," and I think that 99% of people here would consider it worthy.

But you're welcome to PM me, too, if you'd like--though something tells me you'd rather extend your conversation to public ears. 

american irony?

please explain! 

now razlaw should read and take note , soundproof does it with style , wit and doesn't alienate half the board in the process

happy new year !! 

We dont have to argue anymore about the sound-quality with HD-audio in beosystem 3.

But the intrerest thing is that 355f will not explane HOW he has done his tests (in detail) to get his conclusion that BS3 not fully support HD-audio with decoded PCM-sound (from a bluray-player). He just says that BS3 DOES NOT support it.

So why can you (355f) not tell us in this forum how you did your tests and how you get your conclusion about this subject? How much knowledge do you really have about this subject 355f?

/Martin