Karla wrote:
Why do they keep building “dead end” systems which do not connect to the multi-link? B&O might call it a stand alone system and that it is designed to draw the customer to the B&O stores, but all it really does is create a substandard product which is expensive and doesn’t integrate with future purchases, and it discourages the customer from buying more products. It is sort of a bait and switch with the customer dollars.
I think something like a BeoSound 8 is extensible IFF B&O produce something like these ideas:
- a Masterlink (or the new Beolink) black box that interfaces via the Apple iPod interface
- an iPod shaped device that behaves like a Beolink Wireless
WHat I am trying to say, is produce a standalone box with industry standard interfaces ... but then provide black boxes like the BeoLink Active or ML/MCL Convertor to connect the industry standard interface into the B&O world
I am sure no one would complain at pay $500 to extend their $2,000 investment
On the other hand it would be nice if B&O learnt to price things like the BeoLink Active at a price point like the $150 for an Apple TV G2 !