The BL5 is quite another story.
Here the main theme was the sound (have you seen the Pictures of the 'fridge' as they called the early prototypes?) - and then Lewis had to make it look good afterwards.
I neither loved or hated the design of the BL5 when it was introduced, in fact, I didn't know what to think of it simply because there is nothing out there that resembles it. Over time, the design grew on me. I never had any doubts about the performance.
I too purchased my 8000's now 13 years ago because I loved the iconic design. But very soon I had to conclude that it is not a good speaker in terms of performance, especially at lower/normal volume levels. I regret not saving up and buying the Beolab 1 instead at the time. Very soon I started to develop a "form over function" feeling. I still love the design and I really love them as objects but I will think twice when purchasing my next speakers.
I agree with many of you, the new 8003 looks off (in a similar way that the BL9 looks off, TO ME). Taking the 8000 and slapping some things on top of it is simply a very bad mistake. I like the wood as a material but the proportions seem way off. The width of the speaker does not fit the elegant organ pipe base. They should have started from scratch. My oppinion will not change even if it sounds stunning.
The next speakers I buy will need to meet both criteria of a stunning design and solid performance, that is why the BL5 is currently at the top of my wishlist :-)
Perhaps B&O is pulling a prank on us and the real thing is yet to be revealed.
(I still think the old penta is a very good reference when evaluating the performance of a new B&O speaker)
