Another new headphone: BeoPlay HX

60 replies

I mainly listen to classical music. That's why I would like a headphone from B&O. I was set on the HX, but your comments made me think again. I went to the B&O store in Sandvika yesterday, and I tried the HX. The shop keeper asked me if I wanted to try the H95 too, but I said I was too afraid. If I liked the sound of it, then maybe I would change my mind about the HX :)  

My previous experience with headphones is varied. I have the Sony WH-1000XM3, Jabra Elite 85H and the Audio Technica ATH-M50x bluetooth. The last one is for gaming. 

You made me think again, so I have to reconsider. I find it fascinating that you have TWO pairs of H95. 

Hilsen fra Asker :) 

Baard Hansen wrote:

I mainly listen to classical music. That's why I would like a headphone from B&O. I was set on the HX, but your comments made me think again. I went to the B&O store in Sandvika yesterday, and I tried the HX. The shop keeper asked me if I wanted to try the H95 too, but I said I was too afraid. If I liked the sound of it, then maybe I would change my mind about the HX :)

My previous experience with headphones is varied. I have the Sony WH-1000XM3, Jabra Elite 85H and the A udio Technica ATH-M50x bluetooth. The last one is for gaming.

You made me think again, so I have to reconsider. I find it fascinating that you have TWO pairs of H95.

Hilsen fra Asker :)

I bought the hx without trying it first and it was extremely comfortable for me and great for work and listening. For now I just cannot justify the price of an h95.

Baard Hansen wrote:

I mainly listen to classical music. That's why I would like a headphone from B&O. I was set on the HX, but your comments made me think again. I went to the B&O store in Sandvika yesterday, and I tried the HX. The shop keeper asked me if I wanted to try the H95 too, but I said I was too afraid. If I liked the sound of it, then maybe I would change my mind about the HX :)  

My previous experience with headphones is varied. I have the Sony WH-1000XM3, Jabra Elite 85H and the Audio Technica ATH-M50x bluetooth. The last one is for gaming. 

You made me think again, so I have to reconsider. I find it fascinating that you have TWO pairs of H95. 

Hilsen fra Asker :) 

Jeg skal holde det på engelsk i tilfelle andre vil forstå :).

I have had H8, H8i, H9, H9i, H9 3rd Gen and with all the limited editions I started to feel the desire for a different design. Suddenly B&O came up with the H95 and I was sold immediately :).

Then I heard them for the first time. I had a good first impression of the sound, but I remember spending an hour or two just listening to different types of music and watching certain scenes in a few movies just so I could explore their sound performance. I was really blown away. Movies felt almost like going to a movie theatre, and music detailed in a way I had never heard before. If you listen carefully - or may not even have to - you can hear the tiniest instruments and sound effects that are in the background in a way that you had no idea they’ve always been there. At least I had not heard my favourite music like that with any H9s I’d previously owned. After a while I switched back to an old H9i I still have (whose sound I preferred to the H9 3rd Gen), and the H95 is in a different league. Over the years only incremental adjustments had been made from one H9 to the next. I heard reviewers claiming the HX does somewhat more compared to the H9 3rd Gen, but also those who prefer the 3rd Gen.

Now every time I put on my H95s I am excited and they never cease to amaze me. They are gorgeous, they never struggle with any music (be it something bassy, or ambient post-rock with cello, e.g. Hammock - Without Form and Void - try this gem of a music, I think you’ll like it!) and the whole thoughtfulness behind these, for me it’s not a question what I’d recommend. While the HX might sound better than the H9 3rd Gen, the HX will not sound THIS good.

Yes, the price tag is high, but you do get a new design, including magnetic ear cushions, volume and ANC dials that are much nicer than the touch surface on the H9s at least, a very nice aluminium carry case, high quality cables, even a cleaning cloth and a greeting note that tops the experience... All in all you get a whole lot more for your money. I heard they would have cost more than what they have actually launched for (by more than 20%), and in my opinion they would still have been worth the money. Although I probably wouldn’t have bought two pairs then :).

If you are like me and want B&O headphones for music, and want the best sound quality they offer in their line-up, I honestly highly recommend the H95.

 

Thanks for your comments. After reading them I went to the B&O store to get..........the H95 😁

I also wanted to find out how I can use the headset for listening to lossless Apple Music. B&O support gave me this answer:

 

Both the audio cable(3.5mm jack), as well as the USB-C cable, can be used as audio inputs for the Beoplay H95. 

The USB cable supports audio as follows: Stereo 24bit, 48kHz

Apple Lossless Audio Codec(ALAC) can be 24bit up to 194 kHz. Therefore, this surpasses the USB audio capabilities. 

The 3.5mm jack connection is an analogue line-in and can therefore take any signal that is put out by the same connection. therefore the line-in connection will be the best connection to use when listening to ALAC media.

Baard Hansen wrote:

Thanks for your comments. After reading them I went to the B&O store to get..........the H95 😁

I also wanted to find out how I can use the headset for listening to lossless Apple Music. B&O support gave me this answer:

 

Both the audio cable(3.5mm jack), as well as the USB-C cable, can be used as audio inputs for the Beoplay H95. 

The USB cable supports audio as follows: Stereo 24bit, 48kHz

Apple Lossless Audio Codec(ALAC) can be 24bit up to 194 kHz. Therefore, this surpasses the USB audio capabilities. 

The 3.5mm jack connection is an analogue line-in and can therefore take any signal that is put out by the same connection. therefore the line-in connection will be the best connection to use when listening to ALAC media.

That’s fantastic, happy to hear! Congratulations! I suppose I have sold a pair for the store :). Then again I am in a better position because my selling points were based on user experience and not driven by the common motivation of a need to sell to a potential buyer :).

Unfortunately I have no experience with Apple Music lossless files, but please let me and us know about your experience (both first impressions and later) regarding the H95. I hope you’ll be happy with your purchase!

Baard Hansen wrote:

The USB cable supports audio as follows: Stereo 24bit, 48kHz

Apple Lossless Audio Codec(ALAC) can be 24bit up to 194 kHz. Therefore, this surpasses the USB audio capabilities. 

The 3.5mm jack connection is an analogue line-in and can therefore take any signal that is put out by the same connection. therefore the line-in connection will be the best connection to use when listening to ALAC media.

That would heavily depend on the DAC you use I suppose, also in general I would rather rely on the H95 build in processing. Anyway, in practice it is probably best to try both options and decide for yourself which option sounds best to you.

Thanks for your tips. I look forward to testing this out.

Frederik wrote:

That would heavily depend on the DAC you use I suppose, also in general I would rather rely on the H95 build in processing. Anyway, in practice it is probably best to try both options and decide for yourself which option sounds best to you.

 

"Test it and decide for yourself" is the correct answer - however, unfortunately, the answer is much more complicated than this...

If you take the minijack analogue solution, the signal path goes through a DAC of the player and the ADC of the headphones. This means that you do not have the dynamic range that is theoretically possible with a lossless LPCM 24-bit connection (as you would have via USB audio). This is not only because of the limitations of the analogue conversion components (it's physically impossible for any analogue system to have the 140 dB dynamic range of a 24-bit LPCM signal), but also the volume setting of your source and its maximum output level.

If you take the USB-Audio path, then you are relying on the sampling rate converters inside your source or its player (depending on what you're using) for audio files that are 88.2 kHz or higher. Some sampling rate converters are extremely good, since they're not only well-designed but they're running at 32-bit floating point resolution or higher. Other sampling rate converters are audibly terrible, and will degrade your audio signal significantly. The problem is knowing the performance of the SRC in the player software / hardware that you're using. Not only is this difficult / impossible to find out, it could change overnight with a firmware update.

This means that, although you test a file in a player (meaning both software and hardware) through two different signal paths (minijack analogue and USB-Audio digital) today and decide that one is better than the other, your decision might not be valid tomorrow.

To make things even worse, some SRCs are good for one sampling rate combination, but bad for another. For example, I've seen one system where 88.2/16 -> 48 kHz worked great (meaning its artefacts were more than 120 dB below the signal) but 88.2/24 -> 48 on the same system was awful (meaning the aliasing artefacts were only 80 or 90 dB down from signal).

As I said, it's complicated...

Cheers
-Geoff

P.S. All audio is going through H95's built-in processing, regardless of the connection path.

 

PLEASE READ before sending me a Personal Message.

If you have questions about or problems with B&O equipment, these should be directed through your dealer and/or B&O's Customer Service department.

I cannot be a "short circuit", bypassing these communication channels.

Thanks
-geoff
Thanks Geoff that is very interesting and also rather complex…

Firmware 2.0.1 has been released.

Official changelog:

  • fixed issue with high bass and high volume causing distorsion

  • improvements in handling of TikTok

  • USB volume improvements (and volume improvement handling in general)

  • lowered the sound on audio prompts

  • fixed a bug where the voice recognition features weren't working properly

  • improved multipoint handling, less delay

  • fixed issue where, in some headsets, distorsion was on the right side on power on

SO... let's talk about the elephant in the room.

Yes and no. The high volume high bass distorion issue is only partially fixed.I believe what they did was lowering the maximum volume, and changing the DSP behaviour where even if you raise the volume, the bass will proportionally get a bit lowered.I'm saying this because the issue still occurs with some songs, but at a higher volume threshold (i.e. if before it was happening with volume at 75%, now it's happening with volume at 90%, partially IMHO also because of a slight decrease of volume, so the old 75% loudness more or less equals the current 90% volume level).

About the "generic volume improvements", the touch controls are still subpar and not as good as the H9 3rd Gen ones, but I believe now they have increased the number of volume steps that you could set via the touch panel (which previously was much inferior to the number of steps the H9 3rd Gen had - see my previous posts). However, at least, now we have a wider range of volume steps, for a more refined control. I appreciate this.I haven't tried them yet via USB-C to see what the changes are there compared to fw version 1.2.9, but I'll report back once I get a chace to try it.

I haven't noticed the audio cues to be of any lower volume, and actually I'd like to have them to be LOUDER together with the music volume level i.e. they follow the music volume (so you can hear them also when the music is at high volume, which now you can't unless you listen to silent music lol). They shouldn't be fixed at the same volume level, it's such a stupid choice (same goes for the sound that is brought in by the transparency mode, it shouldn't have a fixed volume).

If with "voice recognition" they mean the voice assistant trigger button (long press the round button), it's still crap as it was with fw 1.2.9. The proper Google Assistant integration the H9 3rd Gen had is miles ahead, that was actually useful. The voice assistant trigger of the HX is in my opinion barely usable.

I haven't had any multipoint issuess, so can't comment on that.

There was a slighly audible static/distorsion noise coming from the right driver when switching them on (only noticeable if you had them on your head while switching them on, which anyway is not recommended as it could prevent a proper calibration of the wear sensor), it never bothered me, but now it's gone. Good, I guess.

There are two other changes I've noticed and that aren't mentioned in the changelog:

 

  • new "battery health" section in the product settings page, which shows the current battery level in % (same as the product page) and an estimate of the remaining battery life in minutes (always in minutes lol, it doesn't switch to hours when minutes are more than 60)

  • new "reduce wind noise" toggle below the ANC settings, I won't be able to try its effectiveness as I don't take these headphones for a walk that frequently, but you can feedback on this

Changelog picture and battery health/wind noise setting here: https://imgur.com/a/lTuEgEK

Disappointing that they haven't added the swipe-up gesture to trigger max transparency and simultaneously pause the music (as the H9 3rd Gen had it), and that the plugin in the app still doesn't show the source of the music the headphones are playing from (Bluetooth, USB-C, or aux-in, which the Beoplay Portal have).

Also, the volume bar in the app now looks even buggier than it already was with fw 1.2.9.

The delay in the B&O app opening/connecting to the HX is still there as it was before.

The ANC hasn't got any better (in H9 3rd Gen it's much better, and in H95 it's waaaaaay better).

The Google Fast Pair wrong app link has not been fixed.

The battery level is still bugged and not visible in Windows (it is with H9 3rd Gen).

To be noted is that B&O are also releasing, at the same time as this update for HX, an update for the Portal, numbered 2.0.9, and that is 80% shared with the HX 2.0.1 changelog, except a couple of fixes related to the Xbox connectivity feature which is exclusive of the Portal. This further corraborates the hypothesis that the two headphones share the same base platform and are managed, for what concerns software support, in parallel by the same team.

or
BeoWorld Gold Membership card
Join BeoWorld

Register to access the forums, reference material, and exclusive member benefits — including our monthly prize draw.

Become a Member

December 2026 Prize Draw

Gold Members Only

As a Gold member you're automatically entered into our exclusive prize draw — your chance to win iconic Bang & Olufsen products. A unique benefit of BeoWorld Gold membership, every draw brings a new opportunity to win something special.